Upgrading on radical prostatectomy specimens of very low- and low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: A population-level analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Sayyid, Rashid K. [1 ]
Wilson, Brandon [2 ]
Benton, John Z. [2 ]
Lodh, Atul [2 ]
Thomas, Eric F. [1 ]
Goldberg, Hanan [3 ]
Madi, Rabii [1 ,4 ]
Terris, Martha K. [1 ,4 ]
Wallis, Christopher J. D. [5 ]
Klaassen, Zachary [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, Dept Surg, Sect Urol, Augusta, GA USA
[2] Med Coll Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[3] State Univ New York Upstate, Dept Urol, Syracuse, NY USA
[4] Georgia Canc Ctr, Augusta, GA USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Urol, Nashville, TN USA
来源
关键词
FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.6868
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: A proportion of prostate cancer (PCa) patients initially managed with active surveillance (AS) are upgraded to a higher Gleason score (GS) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). Our objective was to determine predictors of upgrading on RP specimens using a national database. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate with Watchful Waiting database was used to identify AS patients diagnosed with very low- or low-risk PCa who underwent delayed RP between 2010 and 2015. The primary outcome was upgrading to GS 7 disease or worse. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate demographic and oncological predictors of upgrading on final specimen. Results: A total of 3775 men underwent RP after a period of AS, 3541 (93.8%) of whom were cT2a; 792 (21.0%) patients were upgraded on RP specimen, with 85.4%, 10.6%, and 3.4% upgraded to GS 7(3+4), 7(4+3), and 8 diseases, respectively. On multivariable analysis, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis (5-10 vs. 0-2 ng/ml, odd ratio [OR] 2.59, p<0.001) and percent core involvement (80-100% vs. 0-20%, OR 2.52, p=0.003) were significant predictors of upgrading on final RP specimen, whereas higher socioeconomic status predicted lower odds of upgrading (highest vs. lowest quartile OR 0.75, p=0.013). Conclusions: Higher baseline PSA and percent positive cores involvement are associated with significantly increased risk of upgrading on RP after AS, whereas higher socioeconomic status predicts lower odds of such events. These results may help identify patients at increased risk of adverse pathology on final specimen who may benefit from earlier definitive treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:E335 / E339
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] UPGRADING ON RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS OF VERY LOW- AND LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE: A POPULATION-LEVEL ANALYSIS
    Sayyid, Rashid
    Wilson, Brandon
    Benton, John
    Lodh, Atul
    Thomas, Eric
    Goldberg, Hanan
    Madi, Rabii
    Terris, Martha
    Wallis, Christopher
    Klaassen, Zachary
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E887 - E888
  • [2] RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER AFTER INITIAL ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Bul, Meelan
    van den Bergh, Roderick
    van Leeuwen, Pim
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Schroder, Fritz
    Roobol, Monique
    Bangma, Chris
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E585 - E586
  • [3] Active Surveillance: Very Much "Preferred" for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Chapin, Brian F.
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (02): : 262 - 264
  • [4] Active surveillance for patients with very low-risk thyroid cancer
    Lohia, Shivangi
    Hanson, Martin
    Tuttle, R. Michael
    Morris, Luc G. T.
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 5 (01): : 175 - 182
  • [5] Pathologic Upgrading and Mortality in Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy
    Deka, R.
    Simpson, D. R.
    Riviere, P.
    Nalawade, V.
    Mckay, R.
    Murphy, J. D.
    Rose, B. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E273 - E273
  • [6] The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?
    Verep, Samed
    Erdem, Selcuk
    Ozluk, Yasemin
    Kilicaslan, Isin
    Sanli, Oner
    Ozcan, Faruk
    PROSTATE, 2019, 79 (13): : 1523 - 1529
  • [7] PREDICTORS OF UPGRADING AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER: ROLE OF MRI
    Song, Sang Hoon
    Pak, Sahyun
    Park, Sejun
    Song, Cheryn
    Ahn, Hanjong
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E551 - E551
  • [8] Pathological upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in Jamaican men with low-risk prostate cancer
    Morrison, Belinda F.
    Aikenb, William D.
    Reid, Gareth
    Mayhew, Richard
    Hanchard, Barrie
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [9] PREDICTORS OF UPGRADING/UPSIZING IN LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE: VALIDATION OF A MODEL
    Rancati, Tiziana
    Alvisi, Maria Francesca
    Nicolai, Nicola
    Conti, Giario
    Gallucci, Michele
    Martorana, Giuseppe
    Tanello, Marco
    Sanseverino, Roberto
    Bangma, Chris
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (05) : 2623 - 2624
  • [10] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 225 - 230