Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States

被引:25
|
作者
Matsuo, Koji [1 ,2 ]
Mandelbaum, Rachel S. [1 ]
Klar, Maximilian [3 ]
Ciesielski, Katharine M. [1 ]
Matsushima, Kazuhide [4 ]
Matsuzaki, Shinya [1 ]
Roman, Lynda D. [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Jason D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 2020 Zonal Ave,IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[3] Univ Freiburg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[5] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Cervical cancer; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; LACC trial; Trend; Complication; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY; SURGERY; VOLUME; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To examine the influence of the first level I evidence (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer [LACC] trial) on minimally invasive hysterectomy use and perioperative complications for cervical cancer surgery. Methods. This was population-based retrospective observational study, querying National Inpatient Sample. Women with cervical cancer who underwent hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from 10/2015-12/2018 were examined. A quasi-experimental analysis with interrupted-time series was performed to assess the influ-ence of the LACC trial report on minimally invasive hysterectomy use and perioperative complication rates. Results. 5120 women in the pre-LACC period and 1645 women in the post-LACC period were compared. Following the LACC trial report on 3/2018, the minimally invasive hysterectomy use dropped by 19.7 percent points in one month (55.2% in 3/2018 to 35.5% in 4/2018), followed by a continued decline of 8.0% (95% confidence interval 0.1-15.3) monthly. By 12/2018, minimally invasive hysterectomy was used in 17.9% of cases, which was 38.8 percent points lower than the expected rate per the pre-LACC period projection. In multivariable analysis, women in the post-LACC period were 63% less likely to undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.42) but 23% more likely to have a perioperative complication (38.6% versus 29.1%, adjusted-odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.40) compared to those in the pre-LACC period. Women in the post-LACC group were more likely to have a longer hospital stay compared to those in the pre-LACC group (median, 3 versus 2 days, P < 0.001). Conclusion. Following the LACC trial results, U.S. surgeons rapidly shifted from minimally invasive to open hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive surgery was associated with an increase in perioperative complications and longer hospital admissions. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study
    Baiocchi, Glauco
    Ribeiro, Reitan
    Dos Reis, Ricardo
    Falcao, Deraldo Fernando
    Lopes, Andre
    Rangel Costa, Ronaldo Lucio
    Souza Pinto, Gabriel Lowndes
    Vieira, Marcelo
    Kumagai, Lillian Yuri
    Faloppa, Carlos Chaves
    Mantoan, Henrique
    Badiglian-Filho, Levon
    Tsunoda, Audrey Tieko
    Foiato, Tariane Friedrich
    Mattos Cunha Andrade, Carlos Eduardo
    Palmeira, Leonardo Oliveira
    Goncalves, Bruna Tirapelli
    Zanvettor, Paulo Henrique
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (02) : 1151 - 1160
  • [22] Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer
    Kim, Sang Il
    Lee, Jiwoo
    Hong, Jiyun
    Lee, Sung Jong
    Park, Dong Choon
    Yoon, Joo Hee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 18 (05): : 1312 - 1317
  • [23] Modify or abandon: minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Uppal, Shitanshu
    Spencer, Ryan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (05) : 843 - 844
  • [24] Assessing the role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Di Donato, Violante
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Casarin, Jvan
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Malzoni, Mario
    Greggi, Stefano
    Landoni, Fabio
    Bazzurini, Luca
    Zanagnolo, Vanna
    Multinu, Francesco
    Angioli, Roberto
    Plotti, Francesco
    Caruso, Giuseppe
    Fischetti, Margherita
    Ferrandina, Gabriella
    Palaia, Innocenza
    Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 275 : 64 - 69
  • [25] Regional trends of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and exploration of perioperative outcomes
    Holtzman, S.
    Finkelstein, M.
    Huntly, J.
    Kolev, V.
    Zakashansky, K.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 192 - 193
  • [26] Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study
    Glauco Baiocchi
    Reitan Ribeiro
    Ricardo Dos Reis
    Deraldo Fernando Falcao
    Andre Lopes
    Ronaldo Lucio Rangel Costa
    Gabriel Lowndes Souza Pinto
    Marcelo Vieira
    Lillian Yuri Kumagai
    Carlos Chaves Faloppa
    Henrique Mantoan
    Levon Badiglian-Filho
    Audrey Tieko Tsunoda
    Tariane Friedrich Foiato
    Carlos Eduardo Mattos Cunha Andrade
    Leonardo Oliveira Palmeira
    Bruna Tirapelli Gonçalves
    Paulo Henrique Zanvettor
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 1151 - 1160
  • [27] Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jones, Tiffany
    Smith, Anna Jo
    Miao, Diana
    Fader, Amanda
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : S206 - S207
  • [28] Regional trends of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and exploration of perioperative outcomes
    Holtzman, Sharonne
    Chaoul, Jessica
    Finkelstein, Mark
    Kolev, Valentin
    Zakashansky, Konstantin
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 77
  • [29] Utilization of minimally invasive colectomy at safety-net hospitals in the United States
    Branche, Corynn
    Sakowitz, Sara
    Porter, Giselle
    Cho, Nam Yong
    Chervu, Nikhil
    Mallick, Saad
    Bakhtiyar, Syed Shahyan
    Benharash, Peyman
    SURGERY, 2024, 176 (01) : 172 - 179
  • [30] Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
    Roeseler, Jona
    Wolff, Robert
    Bauerschlag, Dirk O.
    Maass, Nicolai
    Hillemanns, Peter
    Ferreira, Helder
    Debrouwere, Marie
    Scheibler, Fueloep
    Geiger, Friedemann
    Elessawy, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (17)