The effectiveness of the revised scaffold safety standard in the construction industry

被引:37
|
作者
Yassin, AS [1 ]
Martonik, JF [1 ]
机构
[1] US Dept Labor, Off Evaluat & Audit Anal OSHA, Direct Evaluat & Anal, Washington, DC 20210 USA
关键词
scaffold; safety; construction; cost savings; fatalities; lost workdays;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2004.05.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the revised scaffold safety standard in the construction industry and to evaluate time trend analyses on scaffold-related fatalities and injuries, as well as inspections conducted and cited violations of the scaffold safety standard set forth in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 1926, Subpart L. Data on scaffold-related fatalities, injuries, and lost workdays, as well as cited violations of scaffold safety, were assembled from sources such as the US Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Integrated Management Information System, and Bureau of Labor Statistics. Data for the period prior to the revision of the standard were compared with data from the period after the revision. We used autoregressive analyses to evaluate the percentage of change in the mean scaffold-related fatalities, injuries and lost workdays and in the OSHA inspections and cited violations of scaffold safety. Effectiveness analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the revised scaffold safety standard in preventing fatal or nonfatal injuries in the construction industry. Complying with the revised scaffold safety standard would prevent approximately 4.6 fatalities, 404 nonfatal injuries, and 2896 lost workdays per year. A total cost savings associated with compliance was estimated at $5.8 million (2001 US$) per year. Compliance with the revised scaffold safety standard would provide a safer workplace and generate a significant cost saving in the construction industry. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 931
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] INDUSTRY STANDARD REVISED FOR CENTRIFUGAL WATER CHILLING PACKAGES
    DILLENBECK, WH
    ASHRAE JOURNAL, 1970, 12 (05): : 67 - +
  • [12] Safety and Productivity in the Construction Industry
    Enshassi, Adnan Ali
    Choudhry, Rafiq Mohammed
    Abd-Abu Alqumboz, Moheeb
    ARAB GULF JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 2009, 27 (03): : 139 - 155
  • [13] Occupational safety in the construction industry
    Johansson, Jan
    Berglund, Leif
    Johansson, Maria
    Nygren, Magnus
    Rask, Kjell
    Samuelson, Bjorn
    Stenberg, Magnus
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2019, 64 (01): : 21 - 32
  • [14] Safety culture in the construction industry
    Wamuziri, S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2006, 159 (03) : 167 - 174
  • [15] Safety Management of the Construction Industry
    Hu Lianghui
    Zhang Lan
    Ma Huizhong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 CHINESE SEMINAR ON THE PRINCIPLES OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, : 212 - 216
  • [16] Implementation of standard work in the construction industry
    Fazinga, W.
    Saffaro, F.
    Isatto, E.
    Lantelme, E.
    REVISTA INGENIERIA DE CONSTRUCCION, 2019, 34 (03): : 288 - 298
  • [17] Safety Leadership Effectiveness Assessment of Project Managers in the Construction Industry: A Case Study of China
    Ma, Yanhong
    Wu, Chunlin
    Fang, Dongping
    Wang, Chao
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2018: SAFETY AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 314 - 323
  • [19] Analysis of the effectiveness of the OSHA steel erection standard in the construction industry (vol 89, pg 190, 2016)
    Choe, Sooyoung
    Yun, Sungmin
    Leite, Fernanda
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 92 : 345 - 345
  • [20] Construction Health and Safety: Effectiveness of Safety Incentive Programme
    Zulkefli, F. A.
    Ulang, N. Md
    Baharum, F.
    SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT SYMPOSIUM (SBES 2014), 2014, 11