Validity and reliability of the Mandarin version of Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-MV) in cancer patients

被引:24
|
作者
Li, Yu-Chi [1 ]
Wang, Hsiu-Hung [2 ]
Ho, Chung-Han [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chung Hwa Univ Med Technol, Dept Nursing, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Nursing, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Med Res, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Pharm, Tainan, Taiwan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; TERMINALLY-ILL; HEALTH-CARE; FAMILY; VALIDATION; SIMPLICITY; THERAPY; BURDEN; DEATH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0203111
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Nurses play an important role in maintaining patients' dignity. How to measure patients' dignity and dignity-related distress is an important issue in nursing care. Use of a reliable and valid tool assessing dignity-related distress in patients is necessary. The study investigated the validity and reliability of the Mandarin Version of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-MV) in cancer patients. The Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) was translated into the Mandarin language using forward and back translation. A convenience sample of 125 adult cancer patients was recruited from the oncology ward of a medical center in southern Taiwan. Factor analysis with principal axis factoring extraction method and oblique rotation (promax) was used to assess the construct validity. Concurrent validity was established using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Mandarin version of Demoralization Scale (DS-MV) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Internal consistency was used to examine the reliability. Data were collected from February to May 2016. As a result of the factor analysis, four factors, including existential distress, loss of support and sense of meaning, symptom distress, and loss of autonomy. Concurrent validity showed that the PDI-MV was significantly correlated with the PHQ-9 (r = 0.25-0.54), DS-MV (r = 0.30-0.58) and the RSES (r = -0.08 to-0.30), Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the PDI-MV and four factors were 0.95, 0.95, 0.84, 0.83, and 0.89 respectively. The PDI-MV is a psychometrically sound instrument assessing a broad range of dignity-related distress issues in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Family Inventory of Needs
    Saglam, Zeynep
    Koc, Zeliha
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2022, 20 (02) : 255 - 263
  • [42] Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Behaviour Problems Inventory
    Jeong, Byounglock
    Yoo, Eunyoung
    Jung, Minye
    Kang, Daehyuk
    Park, Soyeon
    Park, Soo Hyun
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2013, 26 (06) : 578 - 590
  • [43] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Temperament and Character Inventory
    Kijima, N
    Tanaka, E
    Suzuki, N
    Higuchi, H
    Kitamura, T
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2000, 86 (03) : 1050 - 1058
  • [44] Reliability and validity of a Spanish version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory
    Weiss, T
    Berger, R
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2006, 16 (02) : 191 - 199
  • [45] Validity and reliability of the portuguese version of the Pain Coping Inventory
    Oliveira, P.
    Me, Costa
    ACTA REUMATOLOGICA PORTUGUESA, 2012, 37 (02): : 126 - 133
  • [46] Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the dizziness handicap inventory
    Jafarzadeh, Sadegh
    Bahrami, Eshagh
    Pourbakht, Akram
    Jalaie, Shohreh
    Daneshi, Ahmad
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 19 (08): : 769 - 775
  • [47] Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the Eating Disorder Inventory
    Shimura, M
    Horie, H
    Kumano, H
    Sakano, Y
    Suematsu, H
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2003, 92 (01) : 131 - 140
  • [48] Staff perceptions of the use of the patient dignity inventory (PDI) in a Welsh palliative care service
    Lloyd, April
    Stubbings, Daniel R.
    Davies, Joseph L.
    PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 32 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [49] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Mandarin (Simplified) Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-OH45 among cancer patients
    Liu, Jie
    Gao, Jing
    Wu, Chen-Xi
    Bai, Ding-Xi
    Li, Xing
    Guo, Xiao-Xiao
    Yu, Jing-Ya
    Xiao, Qing-Qing
    Bao, Xin-Ru
    He, Lian-Ci
    Zhong, Yi-Zhu
    Chen, Shi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2019, 28 (02)
  • [50] Reliability and Validity of the Greek Version of Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment in Cancer Patients
    Tsilika, Eleni
    Parpa, Efi
    Panagiotou, Irene
    Roumeliotou, Anna
    Kouloulias, Vassilios
    Gennimata, Vassiliki
    Galanos, Antonis
    Mystakidou, Kyriaki
    NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2015, 67 (06): : 899 - 905