Risk and decision methods applied to aquatic ecosystem management

被引:1
|
作者
Payne, B. S. [1 ]
Miller, A. C. [1 ]
Suedel, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Army Engn Res & Dev Ctr, Environm Lab, 3909 Halls Ferry Rd, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-1-4020-5802-8_10
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Increased global trade and modern intercontinental transportation have made invasive species an increasingly prominent stressor of freshwater ecosystems. Invasive species risk assessments, which range from simple screening protocols that focus on species attributes and ecological requirements to rigorous analyses of infestation, have become an important component of environmental impact assessment. In this paper we present two recent case studies in which risk and decision methods were applied to non-toxicological environmental issues that are central to many aquatic ecosystem management programs. The first example reviews potential infestation by the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, on Bayou Bartholomew, located in southeast Arkansas, as a result of the proposed augmentation of low flow conditions by pumping water from the nearby and much larger Arkansas River. The second example presents a retrospective analysis of the results of transplanting fat pocketbook pearly mussels, Potarnilus capax, from an approximately 6-km reach of a drainage ditch in eastern Arkansas. The two examples presented herein indicate the potential for improving environmental decision-making in the face of uncertainty-but in the presence of substantial information. As more rigorous attempts are made to widen and enhance applications of risk and decision methods to environmental decision-making, ecosystem management is likely to further improve.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / +
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ecosystem management and the conservation of aquatic biodiversity and ecological integrity
    Frissell, CA
    Bayles, D
    WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1996, 32 (02): : 229 - 240
  • [22] Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management Society (AEHMS) Preface
    Munawar, Mohiuddin
    Hamza, Waleed
    AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM HEALTH & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 23 (02) : 108 - 111
  • [23] Aquatic ecosystem in India: Economic potential and management strategies
    Nair, NB
    CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF BIODIVERSITY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 251 - 266
  • [24] Ecosystem management and the conservation of aquatic biodiversity and ecological integrity
    Flathead Lake Biological Station, University of Montana, 311 Bio Station Lane, Polson, MT 59860-9659, United States
    不详
    WATER RESOUR. BULL., 2 (229-240):
  • [25] Risk to the supply of ecosystem services across aquatic ecosystems
    Culhane, Fiona
    Teixeira, Heliana
    Nogueira, Antonio J. A.
    Borgwardt, Florian
    Trauner, Daniel
    Lillebo, Ana
    Piet, Gerjan
    Kuemmerlen, Mathias
    McDonald, Hugh
    O'Higgins, Tim
    Barbosa, Ana Luisa
    van der Wal, Jan Tjalling
    Iglesias-Campos, Alejandro
    Arevalo-Torres, Juan
    Barbiere, Julian
    Robinson, Leonie A.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 660 : 611 - 621
  • [26] Risk assessment methods applied to electricity distribution system asset management
    Nordgard, D. E.
    Sand, K.
    Wangensteen, I.
    RELIABILITY, RISK AND SAFETY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 429 - 436
  • [27] Applied analysis of the risk of large financialfor capital management and decision-making.
    Varcholova, Tatiana
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2010, 58 (03): : 315 - 318
  • [28] Decision-Making Methodology for Risk Management Applied to Imja Lake in Nepal
    Cuellar, Amanda D.
    McKinney, Daene C.
    WATER, 2017, 9 (08):
  • [29] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR THE DETECTION THRESHOLD OF POLLUTION IN FRESHWATER AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM
    Martinez Suarez, Alexander
    REVISTA INNOVACIENCIA, 2016, 4 (01): : 39 - 48
  • [30] Research progress and prospect in China of aquatic ecosystem assessment methods
    Yi Y.
    Ye J.
    Ding H.
    Yin S.
    Hupo Kexue/Journal of Lake Sciences, 2024, 36 (03): : 657 - 669