A novel debridement device for the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds: a prospective trial

被引:6
|
作者
Al-Jalodi, Omar [1 ]
Serena, Laura M. [1 ]
Breisinger, Kristy [1 ]
Patel, Keyur [1 ]
Harrell, Khristina [1 ]
Serena, Thomas E. [1 ]
机构
[1] SerenaGrp Res Fdn, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA
关键词
bacterial burden; chronic wound; debridement; diabetes; fluorescence imaging; hard-to-heal wound; infection; ulcer; wound; wound pain;
D O I
10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup5.S32
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objective: Debridement, the removal of nonviable tissue, forms the foundation of wound care practice. Clinicians have a variety of debridement methods at their disposal: sharp, biologic, enzymatic, autolytic and mechanical. The choice of debridement technique depends on the patient care setting, ulcer type and the clinician's experience, training, comfort level and licensure. This prospective study evaluated a novel debridement instrument, EZ-Debride (MDM Ventures, US). Cutting flutes on the head of the tool permit uniform removal of dead tissue while lessening the risk of deeper injury. It may also minimise pain during the debridement procedure. Method: Subjects with hard-to-heal wounds, drawn from a single wound care centre, participated in this institutional review board-approved prospective clinical study. Pain was measured before, during and after debridement using a numerical scale. Assessment of bacterial burden using fluorescence imaging (MolecuLight, Canada) was performed before and after debridement. Results: Enrolment of 10 male and 12 female subjects, with a total of 28 wounds, was carried out over a two-month period by two investigators at a single institution. The average age of subjects was 64 years (range: 22-95 years). The average wound duration was 29 weeks (range: 6-142 weeks). Wound types included diabetic foot, venous leg and pressure ulcers, post-surgical and traumatic wounds. The average pain score at the time of enrolment was 3.9. Subjects reported an average increase in pain with debridement of 0.6 points (range: 0-8). Fluorescence imaging demonstrated a reduction in bacterial load in 69% of cases, with complete resolution in 19% of wounds. Haemostasis was achieved with direct pressure in all cases and the only adverse event was a wound infection that occurred four days after debridement. Conclusion: The results suggest that this novel debridement tool can safely remove nonviable tissue with minimal discomfort and reduce bacterial burden similar to results achieved by sharp debridement.
引用
收藏
页码:S32 / S36
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Host-Directed Approach to the Detection of Infection in Hard-to-Heal Wounds
    Burnet, Michael
    Metcalf, Daniel G.
    Milo, Scarlet
    Gamerith, Clemens
    Heinzle, Andrea
    Sigl, Eva
    Eitel, Kornelia
    Haalboom, Marieke
    Bowler, Philip G.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (10)
  • [42] Experiences of patients with hard-to-heal wounds: insights from a pilot survey
    Wahab, Naz
    Forsyth, R. Allyn
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2024, 33 (10) : 788 - 794
  • [43] Disposable negative pressure wound therapy: benefits for hard-to-heal wounds
    Di Santolo, Cecile
    Collier, Mark
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2022, 31 (02) : S4 - S12
  • [44] Microvascular free-flap reconstruction in acute hard-to-heal wounds
    Ciudad, Pedro
    Vargas, Maria I.
    Castillo-Soto, Ana
    Sanchez, Jefferson R.
    Manrique, Oscar J.
    Bustos, Samyd S.
    Forte, Antonio J.
    Huayllani, Maria T.
    Soto, Zoila
    Antonio Grandez-Urbina, J.
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2020, 29 (10) : 27 - 34
  • [45] Concurrent validity of biofilm detection by wound blotting on hard-to-heal wounds
    Astrada, Adam
    Nakagami, Gojiro
    Minematsu, Takeo
    Goto, Taichi
    Kitamura, Aya
    Mugita, Yuko
    Sanada, Hiromi
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2021, 30 : S4 - S13
  • [46] Hard-to-heal wound treatment medical devices: clinical trial protocol in Japan
    Matsuda, Tatsuya
    Ohura, Norihiko
    Mineta, Koji
    Ho, Mami
    Kaku, I
    Ishii, Kensuke
    Inoue, Madoka
    Ichioka, Shigeru
    Tanaka, Rica
    Kawamoto, Atsuhiko
    Terashi, Hiroto
    Kishi, Kazuo
    Kobayashi, Yoko
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2021, 30 (08) : 666 - 676
  • [47] Benefits of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation in the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds: a case series
    Latouche, Valerie
    Devillers, Herve
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2020, 29 (04) : 248 - 253
  • [48] Guidelines for the use of topical oxygen therapy in the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds based on a Delphi consensus
    Serena, Tomas E.
    Andersen, Charles
    Cole, Windy
    Garoufalis, Matthew
    Frykberg, Robert
    Simman, Richard
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2022, 31 (03) : S20 - S24
  • [49] Treatment of chronic hard-to-heal wounds with hyaloronic acid ester: a case series of six patients
    Maitz, Emanuel
    Binder, Barbara
    WIENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2022, 172 (1-2) : 52 - 56
  • [50] Artificial intelligence in wound care: diagnosis, assessment and treatment of hard-to-heal wounds: a narrative review
    Rippon, Mark
    Fleming, Leigh
    Chen, Tianhua
    Rogers, Alan
    Ousey, Karen
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2024, 33 (04)