Measuring persistent and transient energy efficiency in the US

被引:47
|
作者
Filippini, Massimo [1 ,2 ]
Hunt, Lester C. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Ctr Energy Policy & Econ, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Svizzera Italiana, Dept Econ, Lugano, Switzerland
[3] Univ Surrey, Surrey Energy Econ Ctr, Surrey, England
[4] King Abdullah Petr Studies & Res Ctr KAPSARC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
US total energy demand; Efficiency and frontier analysis; Persistent and transient energy efficiency; DEMAND FRONTIER APPROACH; STOCHASTIC FRONTIER; TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY; PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY; INTENSITY; ELECTRICITY; MODEL; HETEROGENEITY; DECOMPOSITION; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1007/s12053-015-9388-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The promotion of US energy efficiency policy is seen as a very important activity. Generally, the level of energy efficiency of a country or state is approximated by energy intensity, commonly calculated as the ratio of energy use to GDP. However, energy intensity is not an accurate proxy for energy efficiency given that changes in energy intensity are a function of changes in several factors including the structure of the economy, climate, efficiency in the use of resources, behaviour and technical change. The aim of this paper is to measure persistent and transient energy efficiency for the whole economy of 49 states in the US using a stochastic frontier energy demand approach. A total US energy demand frontier function is estimated using panel data for 49 states over the period 1995 to 2009 using two panel data models: the Mundlak version of the random effects model (which estimates the persistent part of the energy efficiency) and the true random effects model (which estimates the transient part of the energy efficiency). The analysis confirms that energy intensity is not a good indicator of energy efficiency, whereas, by controlling for a range of economic and other factors, the measures of energy efficiency obtained via the approach adopted here are. Moreover, the estimates show that although for some states energy intensity might give a reasonable indication of a state's relative energy efficiency, this is not the case for all states.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 675
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring Efficiency Among US Federal Hospitals
    Harrison, Jeffrey P.
    Meyer, Sean
    HEALTH CARE MANAGER, 2014, 33 (02) : 117 - 127
  • [22] Measuring technical efficiency of specialty hospitals in the US
    Kumar, Sameer
    Nunne, William H.
    JOURNAL OF REVENUE AND PRICING MANAGEMENT, 2008, 7 (02) : 139 - 152
  • [23] Measuring technical efficiency of specialty hospitals in the US
    Sameer Kumar
    William H Nunne
    Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2008, 7 (2) : 139 - 152
  • [24] Measuring the efficiency of biomass energy - Response
    Davison, BH
    Ragauskas, AJ
    Templer, R
    Tschaplinski, TJ
    Mielenz, JR
    SCIENCE, 2006, 312 (5781) : 1744 - 1745
  • [25] Measuring Application Software Energy Efficiency
    Capra, Eugenio
    Francalanci, Chiara
    Slaughter, Sandra A.
    IT PROFESSIONAL, 2012, 14 (02) : 54 - 61
  • [26] MEASURING THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF MANUFACTURED HOMES
    MILLS, E
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 1985, 8 (04) : 291 - 294
  • [27] Heterogeneity, transient and persistent technical efficiency of Polish crop farms
    Pisulewski, Andrzej
    Marzec, Jerzy
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (01)
  • [28] Examining the persistent and transient technical efficiency of the Indian fertilizer industry
    Danish, Mohd Shadab
    Roy, Pranith Kumar
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [29] Estimation and determinants of transient and persistent efficiency of rice production in Spain
    Monje, Juan Hernan Cabas
    Sepulveda, Ricardo-Andres Troncoso
    Guesmi, Bouali
    Taghouti, Ibtissem
    Gil, Jose Maria
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2024,
  • [30] Examining the productivity of the ASEAN economies in the presence of transient and persistent efficiency
    Haini, Hazwan
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 8 (01):