Minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for patients with obesity: a propensity score-matched analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Aziz, Mohamed A. Abd El [1 ]
Calini, Giacomo [1 ]
Grass, Fabian [2 ]
Behm, Kevin T. [1 ]
D'Angelo, Anne-Lise [1 ]
Shawki, Sherief [1 ]
Mathis, Kellie L. [1 ]
Larson, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Dept Surg, 200 First St Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne Univ Hosp CHUV, Dept Visceral Surg, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; Surgical site infection; Ulcerative colitis; RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; IMPACT; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-021-02197-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Obesity is a risk factor for failure of pouch surgery completion. However, little is known about the impact of obesity on short-term outcomes after minimally invasive (MIS) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). This study aimed to assess short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing MIS total proctocolectomy (TPC) with IPAA in patients with and without obesity. Materials and methods All adult patients (>= 18 years old) who underwent MIS IPAA as reported in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Participant User Files 2007 to 2018 were included. Patients were divided according to their body mass index (BMI) into two groups (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) vs. BMI < 30 kg/m(2)). Baseline demographics, preoperative risk factors including comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists Class, smoking, different preoperative laboratory parameters, and operation time were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching (1:1) based on logistic regression with a caliber distance of 0.2 of the standard deviation of the logit of the propensity score was used to overcome biases due to different distributions of the covariates. Thirty-day postoperative complications including overall surgical and medical complications, surgical site infection (SSI), organ space infection, systemic sepsis, 30-day mortality, and length of stay were compared between both groups. Results Initially, a total of 2158 patients (402 (18.6%) obese and 1756 (81.4%) nonobese patients) were identified. After 1:1 matching, 402 patients remained in each group. Patients with obesity had a higher risk of postoperative organ/space infection (12.9%; vs. 6.5%; p-value 0.002) compared to nonobese patients. There was no difference between the groups regarding the risk of postoperative sepsis, septic shock, need for blood transfusion, wound disruption, superficial SSI, deep SSI, respiratory, renal, major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation), venous thromboembolism, 30-day mortality, and length of stay. Conclusion MIS IPAA can be safely performed in patients with obesity. However, patients with obesity have a 2-fold risk of organ space infection compared to patients without obesity. Loss of weight before MIS IPAA is recommended not only to allow for pouch creation but also to decrease organ space infections.
引用
收藏
页码:2419 / 2424
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LATE COMPLICATIONS OF THE ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    SANTOS, MC
    THOMPSON, JS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 88 (01): : 3 - 10
  • [32] Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Points of controversy
    Trigui, A.
    Frikha, F.
    Rejab, H.
    Ben Ameur, H.
    Triki, H.
    Ben Amar, M.
    Mzali, R.
    JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2014, 151 (04) : 281 - 288
  • [33] COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    MCMULLEN, K
    HICKS, TC
    RAY, JE
    GATHRIGHT, JB
    TIMMCKE, AE
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 15 (06) : 763 - 767
  • [34] ILEAL-J POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    DOZOIS, RR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 : S80 - S82
  • [35] Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: the Australasian experience
    Rickard, M. J. F. X.
    Young, C. J.
    Bissett, I. P.
    Stitz, R.
    Solomon, M. J.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [36] Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Gastroenterology Perspective
    Kaur, Manreet
    Ippoliti, Andrew F.
    SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (03) : 103 - 109
  • [37] Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Indications and Technique
    Kirat, Hasan T.
    Remzi, Feza H.
    SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 (02) : 82 - 87
  • [38] Staging Considerations for the Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
    Olortegui, Kinga Skowron
    Graham, Ada
    Hyman, Neil
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 26 (07) : 1531 - 1536
  • [39] Should older patients undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?
    Dayton, MT
    Larsen, KR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 172 (05): : 444 - 448
  • [40] FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS
    Lau, H. K.
    van Overstraeten, de Buck A.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 191 (SUPPL 1) : S40 - S41