Minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for patients with obesity: a propensity score-matched analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Aziz, Mohamed A. Abd El [1 ]
Calini, Giacomo [1 ]
Grass, Fabian [2 ]
Behm, Kevin T. [1 ]
D'Angelo, Anne-Lise [1 ]
Shawki, Sherief [1 ]
Mathis, Kellie L. [1 ]
Larson, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Dept Surg, 200 First St Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne Univ Hosp CHUV, Dept Visceral Surg, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; Surgical site infection; Ulcerative colitis; RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; IMPACT; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-021-02197-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Obesity is a risk factor for failure of pouch surgery completion. However, little is known about the impact of obesity on short-term outcomes after minimally invasive (MIS) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). This study aimed to assess short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing MIS total proctocolectomy (TPC) with IPAA in patients with and without obesity. Materials and methods All adult patients (>= 18 years old) who underwent MIS IPAA as reported in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Participant User Files 2007 to 2018 were included. Patients were divided according to their body mass index (BMI) into two groups (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) vs. BMI < 30 kg/m(2)). Baseline demographics, preoperative risk factors including comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists Class, smoking, different preoperative laboratory parameters, and operation time were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching (1:1) based on logistic regression with a caliber distance of 0.2 of the standard deviation of the logit of the propensity score was used to overcome biases due to different distributions of the covariates. Thirty-day postoperative complications including overall surgical and medical complications, surgical site infection (SSI), organ space infection, systemic sepsis, 30-day mortality, and length of stay were compared between both groups. Results Initially, a total of 2158 patients (402 (18.6%) obese and 1756 (81.4%) nonobese patients) were identified. After 1:1 matching, 402 patients remained in each group. Patients with obesity had a higher risk of postoperative organ/space infection (12.9%; vs. 6.5%; p-value 0.002) compared to nonobese patients. There was no difference between the groups regarding the risk of postoperative sepsis, septic shock, need for blood transfusion, wound disruption, superficial SSI, deep SSI, respiratory, renal, major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation), venous thromboembolism, 30-day mortality, and length of stay. Conclusion MIS IPAA can be safely performed in patients with obesity. However, patients with obesity have a 2-fold risk of organ space infection compared to patients without obesity. Loss of weight before MIS IPAA is recommended not only to allow for pouch creation but also to decrease organ space infections.
引用
收藏
页码:2419 / 2424
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for patients with obesity: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Mohamed A. Abd El Aziz
    Giacomo Calini
    Fabian Grass
    Kevin T. Behm
    Anne-Lise D’ Angelo
    Sherief Shawki
    Kellie L. Mathis
    David W. Larson
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2021, 406 : 2419 - 2424
  • [2] Is ileostomy mandatory for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis? A propensity matched analysis of 388 procedures
    Ahmed, Omar
    Lefevre, Jeremie H.
    Collard, Maxime K.
    Creavin, Ben
    Hor, Thevy
    Debove, Clotilde
    Chafai, Najim
    Parc, Yann
    SURGERY, 2020, 168 (01) : 113 - 118
  • [3] Comparative study between open and laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a propensity score-matched study
    El Desoky, Mohamed
    El Nakeeb, Ayman
    El Sorogy, Mohamed
    Hamed, Hosam
    Attia, Mohamed
    Ezzat, Helmy
    El Hemly, Mohamed
    El-Geidi, Ahmed
    Moneer, Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 39 (04): : 985 - 991
  • [4] Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
    McGuire, B. B.
    Brannigan, A. E.
    O'Connell, P. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (07) : 812 - 823
  • [5] Characteristics of learning curve in minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in a single institution
    Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
    Stocchi, Luca
    Costedio, Meagan
    Gorgun, Emre
    Kessler, Hermann
    Remzi, Feza H.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (03): : 1083 - 1092
  • [6] Characteristics of learning curve in minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in a single institution
    Ahmet Rencuzogullari
    Luca Stocchi
    Meagan Costedio
    Emre Gorgun
    Hermann Kessler
    Feza H. Remzi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 1083 - 1092
  • [7] MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY AND ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS: AN ATTRACTIVE MANAGEMENT OPTION FOR PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS
    Ahmed, J.
    Stefan, S.
    Goh, N.
    Flashman, K.
    Khan, J.
    Parvaiz, A.
    GUT, 2015, 64 : A425 - A426
  • [8] PROCTECTOMY WITH ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    HAUTEFEUILLE, P
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1993, 47 (10): : 956 - 958
  • [9] Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
    Alves, A
    Panis, Y
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2005, 130 (6-7): : 421 - 425
  • [10] THE ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS PROCEDURE
    SACLARIDES, TJ
    PROBLEMS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 1990, 7 (03): : 463 - 470