Corporate governance in Islamic banks: New insights for dual board structure and agency relationships

被引:109
|
作者
Farag, Hisham [1 ]
Mallin, Chris [2 ]
Ow-Yong, Kean [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Business Sch, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Business Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
Islamic banks; Shari'ah Supervisory Board; Financial performance; Corporate governance; GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS; PANEL-DATA; DIRECTORS; PERFORMANCE; SIZE; DIVERSITY; DETERMINANTS; ORGANIZATION; SUPERVISION; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.intfin.2017.08.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate the influence of the dual board structure on the financial performance of Islamic banks. The paper also investigates the unique agency relationships using a sample of 90 Islamic banks across 13 countries over the period 2006-2014. We find that the larger the Shari'ah Supervisory Board (SSB) the better the financial performance and this result reinforces the fundamental role of the SSB to certify permissible financial instruments and products. We also find evidence of the scope of operation hypothesis with respect to both the board of directors and the SSB as Islamic banks are characterised by a higher degree of complex operations. Interestingly, we find that a larger SSB size may result in lower agency costs and that the greater the size of the unrestricted contracts, the higher the agency costs. This implies that unrestricted profit-sharing contracts are one of the main sources of the unique agency relationships in Islamic banks. The paper has a number of policy implications for regulators including the design of governance mechanisms in Islamic banks and the dynamics of unrestricted contracts. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 77
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Corporate Governance Practices by Islamic and Conventional Banks in Pakistan
    Ansari, Sanaullah
    Siddique, Muhammad Abubakar
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE, 2013, : 493 - 497
  • [22] A consensus-based corporate governance paradigm for Islamic banks
    Abdel-Baki, Monal
    Sciabolazza, Valerio Leone
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2014, 6 (01) : 93 - 108
  • [23] CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN ISLAMIC BANKS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Hanif, Muhammd Farras
    Haron, Razali
    IIUM LAW JOURNAL, 2022, 30 : 57 - 92
  • [24] Best practice in bank corporate governance: The case of Islamic banks
    Alatassi, Bchr
    Letza, Steve
    ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 4 (04) : 115 - 133
  • [25] Does corporate governance affect the performance and stability of Islamic banks?
    Mamatzakis, Emmanuel
    Alexakis, Christos
    Al Yahyaee, Khamis
    Pappas, Vasileios
    Mobarek, Asma
    Mollah, Sabur
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2023, 23 (04): : 888 - 919
  • [26] Profitability and Stability of GCC Islamic Banks: The Role of Corporate Governance
    Ben Khediri, Karim
    Abidi, Asma
    Sayari, Sonia
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (06): : 29 - 40
  • [27] The new paradigm of Islamic corporate governance
    Mansour, Walid
    Bhatti, M. Ishaq
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2018, 44 (05) : 513 - 523
  • [28] Deposits structure, ownership concentration and corporate governance disclosure in GCC Islamic banks: Empirical evidence
    Grassa, Rihab
    JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2018, 9 (04) : 587 - 606
  • [29] Dual board governance structure and multi-bank performance: a comparative analysis between Islamic banks in Southeast Asia and GCC countries
    Nomran, Naji Mansour
    Haron, Razali
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2019, 19 (06): : 1377 - 1402
  • [30] An evaluation of corporate governance practices of Islamic banks versus Islamic bank windows of conventional banks A case of Pakistan
    Bukhari, Khuram Shahzad
    Awan, Hayat M.
    Ahmed, Faareha
    MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2013, 36 (04): : 400 - 416