Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

被引:18
|
作者
Trotsyuk, Iryna [1 ]
Sparschuh, Halina [1 ]
Mueller, Alice Josephine [1 ]
Neumann, Konrad [2 ,3 ]
Kruschewski, Martin [4 ]
Horst, David [1 ]
Elezkurtaj, Sefer [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Campus Charite Mitte, Inst Pathol, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Biometrie & Klin Epidemiol, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] BIH, Anna Louisa Karsch 2, D-10178 Berlin, Germany
[4] Klin Allgemein & Viszeralchirurg Klinikum, Mullroser Chaussee 7, D-15236 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Rectal cancer; Neoadjuvant therapy; Tumor budding; Prognostic factor; POSTOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; REGRESSION; CARCINOMA; MARKER;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-019-6261-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Budding is a complementary prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of tumor budding in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Methods: A total of 124 patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and consecutive surgery were included. Surgical specimens were evaluated for budding and routine clinicopathological features. Budding was evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides and by cytokeratin immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Results: A budding rate of 36.9% (n = 38) by H&E and 55.6% (n = 55) by IHC was observed. Budding was significantly associated with a high ypT and ypN status, poor differentiation, and low degrees of tumor regression. Moreover, budding was strongly predictive of a worse patient outcome, as measured by tumor recurrence or death. In multivariate analyses, budding remained the only significant parameter for overall survival and was even superior to the ypT and ypN status (budding in H&E: hazard ratio (HR) 2.72, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15-6.44, p = 0.023; budding in IHC: HR 5.19, 95% CI 1.62-16.61, p = 0.006). Conclusion: Budding is a strong prognostic predictor of survival in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy. A standardized evaluation of tumor budding after neoadjuvant therapy may thus aid in risk stratification and guide the clinical management of patients with rectal cancer. Immunostaining can help to enhance the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adjuvant Chemotherapy after neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal cancer
    Reibetanz, J.
    Germer, C. -T.
    CHIRURG, 2014, 85 (06): : 544 - 544
  • [32] Prognostic Implication of Negative Lymph Node Count in ypN plus Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Construction of a Prediction Nomogram
    Sun, Yanwu
    Zhang, Yiyi
    Huang, Zhekun
    Chi, Pan
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2019, 23 (05) : 1006 - 1014
  • [33] Prognostic and staging value of tumor deposits in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Xu, Tianlei
    Yu, Zhuo
    Zhang, Qian
    Liu, Botao
    Li, Yuanxin
    Wang, Feng
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (12) : 5028 - +
  • [34] A Multigene Model for Predicting Tumor Responsiveness After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
    Cho, Eunhae
    Park, In Ja
    Yeom, Seung-Seop
    Hong, Seung Mo
    Lee, Jung Bok
    Kim, Yeon Wook
    Kim, Mi-Ju
    Lim, Hye Min
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (04): : 834 - 842
  • [35] Are We Predicting Disease Progress of the Rectal Cancer Patients without Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy?
    Oh, Bo Young
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Park, Yoon Ah
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Chun, Ho-Kyung
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 50 (03): : 634 - 645
  • [36] Quantitative imaging outperforms molecular markers when predicting response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Joye, Ines
    Debucquoy, Annelies
    Deroose, Christophe M.
    Vandecaveye, Vincent
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    Wolthuis, Albert
    D'Hoore, Andre
    Sagaert, Xavier
    Zhou, Mu
    Gevaert, Olivier
    Haustermans, Karin
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 124 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [37] Prognostic factors in patients with complete response of the tumour (ypT0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical resection of rectal cancer
    Zhang, Hang
    Sun, Ge
    Zheng, Kuo
    Lou, Zheng
    Gao, Xian H.
    Meng, Rong G.
    Furnee, Edgar J. B.
    Zhang, Wei
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (04) : E190 - E195
  • [38] Oncologic Outcome After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Pathologic T0 (ypT0) Rectal Cancer
    Jang, Tae Young
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Hong, Seung-Mo
    Kim, Tae Won
    Kim, Jong Hoon
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2012, 55 (10) : 1024 - 1031
  • [39] Clinical outcomes in elderly rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: impact of tumor regression gradeTumor regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in elderly rectal cancer patients
    Consuelo Rosa
    Monica Di Tommaso
    Luciana Caravatta
    Maria Taraborrelli
    Lucrezia Gasparini
    Fiorella Cristina Di Guglielmo
    Andrea Delli Pizzi
    Sebastiano Cinalli
    Michele Marchioni
    Marta Di Nicola
    Carmine Lanci
    Giampiero Ausili Cefaro
    Domenico Genovesi
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2021, 147 : 1179 - 1188
  • [40] Response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, ypT-stage and lymph node involvement in mid and low rectal cancer
    Frunza, A.
    Garcia Florez, L. J.
    Gomez Alvarez, G.
    Fresno Forcelledo, M. F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S510 - S511