Formability evaluation of 3D closed section parts from sheet metal based on geometrical information

被引:1
|
作者
Tokugawa, Akihiro [1 ]
Sato, Masahiko [2 ]
Kuriyama, Yukihisa [1 ]
Suzuki, Katsuyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778568, Japan
[2] Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Met Corp, Steel Res Labs, 20-1 Shintomi, Futtsu, Chiba 2938511, Japan
关键词
sheet metal; bending; formability; Gaussian curvature; metric tensor; DEFORMATION; PLATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.020
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
For successful sheet metal forming, a complex design and trial process are inevitably necessary. That complex process is geometrical design, forming process selection, tool / die face design and forming condition. It may take couple of months to carry out this process, and at the end of this process try out may result in unsuccessful. The cause of this unsuccessful try out is difficult to find out because of the complexity of the design and try out process. It is proposed that a new evaluation methodology can provide semi-quantitate evaluation for the forming difficulty of the sheet. The proposed method evaluates only geometry of sheet metal parts, starting with Riemann curvature, which is decomposed into Gaussian curvature and metric tensor. Because the nature of sheet metal forming failure (breakage and wrinkle) are mainly related to in-plane deformation and not so much related to out of plane bending. Gaussian curvature is an excellent index for in-plane deformation caused by geometry angulation. Metric tensor provide quantitative evaluation for in-plane deformation. Computational time for this proposed method is a couple of minutes and is suitable for the evaluation and modification of the upstream design. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 106
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Rethink 3D metal printing of turbomachinery parts
    Murphree, Zach
    Plant Engineering, 2020, : 25 - 26
  • [23] 3D ultrasonic imaging for sheet metal hydroforming
    Meier, H.
    Ermert, H.
    Knoll, P.
    Keitmann-Curdes, O.
    SHEET METAL 2005, 2005, 6-8 : 401 - 406
  • [24] Application of 3D printing in sheet metal forming
    Klimyuk, Daniil
    Serezhkin, Mikhail
    Plokhikh, Andrey
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 38 : 1579 - 1583
  • [25] 3D strain measurement from gratings on both surfaces of sheet metal
    Andresen, K
    Hentrich, K
    ARCHIVE OF APPLIED MECHANICS, 2000, 70 (06) : 443 - 452
  • [26] 3D Strain measurement from gratings on both surfaces of sheet metal
    K. Andresen
    K. Hentrich
    Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2000, 70 : 443 - 452
  • [27] Mutual information based evaluation of 3D building models
    Suveg, I
    Vosselman, G
    16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 557 - 560
  • [28] A Triaxial Failure Diagram to predict the forming limit of 3D sheet metal parts subjected to multiaxial stresses
    Rastellini, F.
    Socorro, G.
    Forgas, A.
    Onate, E.
    NUMISHEET 2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF 3D SHEET METAL FORMING PROCESSES, PTS A AND B, 2016, 734
  • [29] Continuous Sheet Metal Forming-A Linearly Incremental Forming Method for Manufacturing 3D Surface Parts
    Cai, Zhong-Yi
    Hu, Zhi-Qing
    Lan, Ying-Wu
    Li, Ming-Zhe
    NANOTECHNOLOGY AND ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2012, 486 : 334 - 339
  • [30] Parameters Evaluation in 3D Spare Parts Printing
    Vujovic, Igor
    Soda, Josko
    Kuzmanic, Ivica
    Petkovic, Miro
    ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (04) : 1 - 9