Premedication for bronchoscopy in older patients: a double-blind comparison of two regimens

被引:10
|
作者
Watts, MR
Geraghty, R
Moore, A
Saunders, J
Swift, CG
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Limerick Reg Hosp, Clin Age Assessment Unit, Dept Med Elderly, Dooradoyle, Co Limerick, Ireland
[2] Queen Marys Sidcup NHS Trust, Sidcup, Kent, England
[3] Univ Limerick, Stat Consulting Unit, Limerick, Ireland
[4] Kings Coll London, Guys Kings & St Thomas Sch Med, Clin Age Res Unit, London, England
关键词
bronchoscopy; premedication; older patients; sedation;
D O I
10.1016/j.rmed.2004.06.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Older patients are the most prevalent age cohort requiring bronchoscopy. Prior sedation should be offered to improve patient comfort and operator technical ease. Older patients have increased sensitivity to centrally acting drugs increasing the procedural risk. This perceived risk may limit access to bronchoscopy in older patients. There have been no systematic prospective placebo-controlled studies in older patients. We compared a novel premedication regimenoral temazepam plus nebulised lignocaine (new treatment) to an established regimen of intravenous alfentanyl (control). Methods: Consecutive patients 75 years and older referred for bronchoscopy were considered. Twenty-five patients were randomly assigned to each group. The primary outcome measure was the lowest oxygen saturation recorded from the administration of IV drugs and for 30 min post-bronchoscopy. Results: The lowest mean oxygen saturation in the new treatment group was 92.2% (90.3-94.2) and in the control group 91.1% (89.2-93.1). This was not statistically different (P = 0.370). There were no adverse events. Conclusion: This is the largest prospective study to date on an older population undergoing bronchoscopy supporting previous retrospective findings regarding the safety of this procedure. Determined by oxygen saturations there is no difference in safety between premedication regimens comprising oral temazepam/nebutised lignocaine or intravenous alfentanyl. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 226
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension
    Staessen, JA
    Fagard, R
    Thijs, L
    Celis, H
    Arabidze, GG
    Birkenhager, WH
    Bulpitt, CJ
    deLeeuw, PW
    Dollery, CT
    Fletcher, AE
    Forette, F
    Leonetti, G
    Nachev, C
    OBrien, ET
    Rosenfeld, J
    Rodicio, JL
    Tuomilehto, J
    Zanchetti, A
    LANCET, 1997, 350 (9080): : 757 - 764
  • [32] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF TYBAMATE AND CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS
    GOLDSTEIN, BJ
    PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1967, 8 (06) : 334 - 337
  • [33] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF KETANSERIN AND PROPRANOLOL IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
    STAESSEN, J
    FAGARD, R
    LIJNEN, P
    RORIVE, G
    AMERY, A
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 12 (06) : 718 - 725
  • [34] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF ETODOLAC AND NAPROXEN IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS
    PENA, M
    LIZARAZO, H
    ACTA THERAPEUTICA, 1991, 17 (01) : 5 - 18
  • [35] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF CLONIDINE AND METHYLDOPA IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
    MROCZEK, WJ
    DAVIDOV, M
    FINNERTY, FA
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1972, 76 (05) : 875 - +
  • [36] A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF NAPROXEN AND ESTROGEN IN CLIMACTERIC PATIENTS
    HAATAJA, M
    GRONROOS, M
    PUNNONEN, R
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1982, : 30 - 30
  • [37] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON WITH PIMOZIDE AND CARPIPRAMINE IN SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS
    KUDO, Y
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA, 1972, 26 : 75 - &
  • [38] A double-blind comparison of nefazodone and fluoxetine in depressed patients
    Rioux, P
    Kibleur, Y
    Frachon, O
    vonFrenckell, R
    Zarifian, E
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY BULLETIN, 1996, 32 (03) : 505 - 505
  • [39] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF CAPTOPRIL AND ENALAPRIL IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
    VLASSES, PH
    ROTMENSCH, HH
    ROCCI, ML
    CONNER, DP
    SWANSON, BN
    FERGUSON, RK
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1984, 35 (02) : 280 - 280