Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four different multifocal intraocular lenses

被引:1
|
作者
Bostanci Ceran, Basak [1 ]
Takmaz, Tamer [2 ]
Can, Izzet [3 ]
Demirok, Gulizar [4 ]
Uysal, Betul Seher [5 ]
机构
[1] Ulucanlar Eye Training & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ataturk Training & Res Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Maya Eye Hosp, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Ufuk Univ, Dr Ridvan Ege Hosp, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Ataturk Training & Res Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Cataract surgery; multifocal IOLs; phacoemulsification; premium IOLs; presbyopia; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; BILATERAL IMPLANTATION; PREPRESBYOPIC PATIENTS; READING PERFORMANCE; VISUAL EVALUATION; DISCRIMINATION; SENTENCES; CATARACT; MODELS;
D O I
10.3906/sag-1403-24
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/ aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and optical performance of 4 different multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Materials and methods: Ninety eyes of 51 patients who received Reviol MFM 611, Reviol MFM 625, Acri. LISA, and ReSTOR SN6AD3 multifocal IOLs after cataract surgery were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were similar in terms of age, sex, cataract hardness and axial length. The mean outcome measures were uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate and near visual acuity (DCIVA, DCNVA), intra or postoperative complications, and contrast sensitivity (CS) results under mesopic conditions. The mean follow up period was 10.5 months (range: 6-12 months). Results: All cases were within +/- 0.75 D of emmetropia. Postoperative increase in UDVA and DCNVA was statistically significant in all groups. The Acri. LISA group showed slightly lower DCIVA compared with the other IOLs. CS was clinically similar between the groups. None of the patients developed any early or late postoperative complication or neuroadaptation problem, which necessitated explantation of the lens. Conclusion: All four multifocal lens designs provided satisfactory visual functions and CS results in patients who fulfilled the criteria for multifocal lens implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 603
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Outcomes with Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses in Cases in Which Multifocal Lenses Are Not Primarily Recommended
    Alvarez-Garcia, Maria Teresa
    Fuente-Garcia, Carlota
    Munoz-Puyol, Cristina
    Pinero, David P.
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 2023
  • [32] Comparison of Visual Performance of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses with Same Material Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
    Yamauchi, Tomofusa
    Tabuchi, Hitoshi
    Takase, Kosuke
    Ohsugi, Hideharu
    Ohara, Zaigen
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06):
  • [33] Multifocal intraocular lenses
    Shajari, Mehdi
    Mayer, Wolfgang J.
    Priglinger, Siegfried
    Kreutzer, Thomas
    SPEKTRUM DER AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2019, 33 (06) : 165 - 168
  • [34] MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES
    DUFFEY, RJ
    ZABEL, RW
    LINDSTROM, RL
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (04): : 423 - 429
  • [35] Intraocular multifocal lenses
    Pieh S.
    Spektrum der Augenheilkunde, 2016, 30 (6) : 213 - 216
  • [36] Multifocal intraocular lenses
    Auffarth, G. U.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2008, 105 (06): : 521 - 521
  • [37] Comparison of clinical outcomes with three different aspheric intraocular lenses
    Lee, Kyung-Min
    Park, Shin-Hae
    Joo, Choun-Ki
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2011, 89 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [38] Comparison of the optical behaviour of five different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses in a model eye
    Can, Efe
    Senel, Esat Can
    Holmstroem, Sven T. S.
    Pinero, David P.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [39] Comparison of the optical behaviour of five different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses in a model eye
    Efe Can
    Esat Can Senel
    Sven T. S. Holmström
    David P. Piñero
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [40] Clinical Outcomes Following Implantation of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses With Varying Add Powers
    Kim, Jin Sun
    Jung, Ji Won
    Lee, Ji Min
    Seo, Kyoung Yul
    Kim, Eung Kweon
    Kim, Tae-Im
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 160 (04) : 702 - 709