Impact of agricultural-based biofuel production on greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change: Key modelling choices

被引:24
|
作者
Panichelli, Luis [1 ]
Gnansounou, Edgard [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Bioenergy & Energy Planning Res Grp GR GN INTER E, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
来源
关键词
Biofuel; Land-use change; Greenhouse gas emission; Modelling choice; Policy; SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODEL; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; BIOENERGY RESOURCES; BRAZILIAN AMAZONIA; ENERGY; BIOMASS; POLICIES; COVER; COMPETITION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recent regulations on biofuels require reporting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions related to feedstock-specific biofuels. However, the inclusion of GHG emissions from land-use change (LUC) into law and policy remains a subject of active discussion, with LUC-GHG emissions an issue of intense research. This article identifies key modelling choices for assessing the impact of biofuel production on LUC-GHG emissions. The identification of these modelling choices derives from evaluation and critical comparison of models from commonly accepted biofuels-LUC-GHG modelling approaches. The selection and comparison of models were intended to cover factors related to production of agricultural-based biofuel, provision of land for feedstock, and GHG emissions from land-use conversion. However, some fundamental modelling issues are common to all stages of assessment and require resolution, including choice of scale and spatial coverage, approach to accounting for time, and level of aggregation. It is argued here that significant improvements have been made to address LUC-GHG emissions from biofuels. Several models have been created, adapted, coupled, and integrated, but room for improvement remains in representing LUC-GHG emissions from specific biofuel production pathways, as follows: more detailed and integrated modelling of biofuel supply chains; more complete modelling of policy frameworks, accounting for forest dynamics and other drivers of LUC; more heterogeneous modelling of spatial patterns of LUC and associated GHG emissions; and clearer procedures for accounting for the time-dependency of variables. It is concluded that coupling the results of different models is a convenient strategy for addressing effects with different time and space scales. In contrast, model integration requires unified scales and time approaches to provide generalised representations of the system. Guidelines for estimating and reporting LUC-GHG emissions are required to help modellers to define the most suitable approaches and policy makers to better understand the complex impacts of agricultural-based biofuel production. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 360
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mitigation Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture and Land-Use Change: Consequences for Food Prices
    Stevanovic, Miodrag
    Popp, Alexander
    Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon
    Humpenoeder, Florian
    Mueller, Christoph
    Weindl, Isabelle
    Dietrich, Jan Philipp
    Lotze-Campen, Hermann
    Kreidenweis, Ulrich
    Rolinski, Susanne
    Biewald, Anne
    Wang, Xiaoxi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (01) : 365 - 374
  • [22] Emissions of greenhouse gases from agriculture, land-use change, and forestry in the Gambia
    Jallow, BP
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1995, 38 (2-3) : 301 - 312
  • [23] Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry, land-use changes, and agriculture in Tanzania
    Muyungi, RS
    Omujuni, C
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1995, 38 (2-3) : 313 - 316
  • [24] Effects of urban land-use regulations on greenhouse gas emissions
    Leibowicz, Benjamin D.
    CITIES, 2017, 70 : 135 - 152
  • [25] Consequences of feasible future agricultural land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks and greenhouse gas emissions in Great Britain
    Smith, P.
    Bhogal, A.
    Edgington, P.
    Black, H.
    Lilly, A.
    Barraclough, D.
    Worrall, F.
    Hillier, J.
    Merrington, G.
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 26 (04) : 381 - 398
  • [26] Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use
    Cardoso, Abmael S.
    Berndt, Alexandre
    Leytem, April
    Alves, Bruno J. R.
    de Carvalho, Isabel das N. O.
    de Barros Soares, Luis Henrique
    Urquiaga, Segundo
    Boddey, Robert M.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 143 : 86 - 96
  • [27] Greenhouse-gas emissions from biofuel use in Asia
    Streets, DG
    Waldhoff, ST
    NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES: SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING, CONTROL AND IMPLEMENTATION, 2000, : 247 - 254
  • [28] Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from the cattle sector: Land-use regulation as an alternative to emissions pricing
    Gerard, Maxence
    De Cara, Stephane
    Meunier, Guy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2025, 107 (01) : 312 - 345
  • [29] Biofuel for Energy Security: An Examination on Pyrolysis Systems with Emissions from Fertilizer and Land-Use Change
    Kung, Chih-Chun
    Xie, Hualin
    Wu, Tao
    Chen, Shih-Chih
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (02): : 571 - 588
  • [30] Land use, land-use change, forestry, and agricultural activities in the clean development mechanism: Estimates of greenhouse gas offset potential
    Bloomfield J.
    Pearson H.L.
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2000, 5 (1) : 9 - 24