The potential of agricultural soils of the upper St. Joseph river watershed to sequester carbon

被引:50
|
作者
Trujillo, W
Lal, R
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Carbon Management & Sequestrat Ctr, FAES OARDC, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Sch Nat Resources, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE | 2004年 / 24卷 / 04期
关键词
SOC pool; carbon sequestration; land use; soil/crop management; Ohio; Indiana; Michigan; conservation tillage; CRP; conservation buffer;
D O I
10.1300/J064v24n04_03
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This paper assesses the potential to sequester C in soils under different land use systems in the Upper St. Joseph River Watershed by evaluating land use and management options that lead to an increase in soil C concentration above the Current levels. Under the present land use systems, the Current soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rate calculated for different, soil/crop management practices, ranges between 37.8 and 56.0 Gg yr(-1) (I Gg = 10(9) g = one thousand metric ton). Losses of SOC are primarily due to plow tillage estimated at 12.8 to 20.2 Gg C. The SOC sequestration potential is estimated at 67.8 to 102.0 Gg C yr(-1) through adoption of improved land use and soil/crop management practices. Conversion from plow till to no-till with continuous or rotational cropping system contributes 52% of the total SOC sequestration potential. Restoration of wetlands, incorporation of pasture/hay into the rotation cycle, and conversion to Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) contribute about 48% of the total sequestration potential. (C) 2004 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 15
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Managing reforestation to sequester carbon, increase biodiversity potential and minimize loss of agricultural land
    Paul, Keryn I.
    Cunningham, Shaun C.
    England, Jacqueline R.
    Roxburgh, Stephen H.
    Preece, Noel D.
    Lewis, Tom
    Brooksbank, Kim
    Crawford, Debbie F.
    Polglase, Philip J.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 51 : 135 - 149
  • [32] Population abundance and stock characteristics of flathead catfish in the lower St. Joseph River, Michigan
    Daugherty, DJ
    Sutton, TM
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, 2005, 25 (03) : 1191 - 1201
  • [33] Assessment of fish mercury levels in the upper St. Lawrence River, Canada
    Neff, Margaret R.
    Robinson, Jennifer M.
    Bhavsar, Satyendra P.
    JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (02) : 336 - 343
  • [34] Mammals from the St. Mary River Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Montana
    Hunter, John P.
    Heinrich, Ronald E.
    Weishampel, David B.
    JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, 2010, 30 (03) : 885 - 898
  • [35] Biogeochemistry and dechlorination potential at the St. Joseph aquifer-Lake Michigan interface
    Adriaens, P
    Lendvay, JM
    McCormick, ML
    Dean, SM
    IN SITU AND ON-SITE BIOREMEDIATION, VOL 3, 1997, 4(3) (03): : 173 - 178
  • [36] Age and variability of dissolved organic carbon in the St. Lawrence River
    Moingt, M.
    Hillaire-Marcel, C.
    Dever, L.
    Gelinas, Y.
    Barbecot, F.
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 71 (15) : A677 - A677
  • [37] Exploring the Potential Impact of Serious Games on Social Learning and Stakeholder Collaborations for Transboundary Watershed Management of the St. Lawrence River Basin
    Medema, Wietske
    Furber, Alison
    Adamowski, Jan
    Zhou, Qiqi
    Mayer, Igor
    WATER, 2016, 8 (05)
  • [38] Carbon sequestration and its potential in agricultural soils of China
    Sun, Wenjuan
    Huang, Yao
    Zhang, Wen
    Yu, Yongqiang
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2010, 24
  • [39] Diel movement patterns and habitat use of flathead catfish in the lower St. Joseph River, Michigan
    Daugherty, DJ
    Sutton, TM
    JOURNAL OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY, 2005, 20 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [40] The potential of Miscanthus to sequester carbon in soils: comparing field measurements in Carlow, Ireland to model predictions
    Dondini, Marta
    Hastings, Astley
    Saiz, Gustavo
    Jones, Michael B.
    Smith, Pete
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2009, 1 (06): : 413 - 425