Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the face of external biophysical stressors

被引:46
|
作者
Friess, Daniel A. [1 ]
Phelps, Jacob [2 ]
Garmendia, Eneko [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Geog, Singapore 117570, Singapore
[2] Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, Jalan CIFOR, Sindang Barang 16115, Bogor, Indonesia
[3] Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Bilbao 48008, Bizkaia, Spain
[4] Ikerbasque, Basque Fdn Sci, Bilbao 48008, Spain
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England
[6] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
关键词
Blue carbon; Ecosystem stability; Permanence; REDD; Regime shift; Transaction costs; INVASIVE ALIEN PLANTS; SEA-LEVEL RISE; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CORAL-REEFS; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION; MISSISSIPPI DELTA; SOUTH-AFRICA; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Economic instruments such as Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes are increasingly promoted to protect ecosystems (and their associated ecosystem services) that are threatened by processes of local and global change. Biophysical stressors external to a PES site, such as forest fires, pollution, sea level rise, and ocean acidification, may undermine ecosystem stability and sustained ecosystem service provision, yet their threats and impacts are difficult to account for within PES scheme design. We present a typology of external biophysical stressors, characterizing them in terms of stressor origin, spatial domain and temporal scale. We further analyse how external stressors can potentially impinge on key PES parameters, as they (1) threaten ecosystem service provision, additionality and permanence, (2) add challenges to the identification of PES providers and beneficiaries, and (3) add complexity and costs to PES mechanism design. Effective PES implementation under external stressors requires greater emphasis on the evaluation and mitigation of external stressors, and further instruments that can accommodate associated risks and uncertainties. A greater understanding of external stressors will increase our capacity to design multi-scale instruments to conserve important ecosystems in times of environmental change. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 42
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Green without envy: how social capital alleviates tensions from a Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) program in Indonesia
    McGrath, Francesca L.
    Erbaugh, James T.
    Leimona, Beria
    Amaruzaman, Sacha
    Rahadian, Nana P.
    Carrasco, L. Roman
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (04):
  • [42] Fifteen years of research on payments for ecosystem services (PES): Piercing the bubble of success as defined by a Northern-driven agenda
    Kolinjivadi, Vijay
    Van Hecken, Gert
    Merlet, Pierre
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2023, 83
  • [43] Collective Local Payments for ecosystem services: New local PES between groups, sanctions, and prior watershed trust in Mexico
    Pfaff, Alexander
    Rodriguez, Luz A.
    Shapiro-Garza, Elizabeth
    WATER RESOURCES AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 28
  • [44] Do payments for forest ecosystem services generate double dividends? An integrated impact assessment of Vietnam's PES program
    Thu-Ha Dang Phan
    Brouwer, Roy
    Long Phi Hoang
    Davidson, Marc David
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (08):
  • [45] Developed-developing world partnerships for sustainable development (2): An illustrative case for a payments for ecosystem services (PES) approach
    Everard, Mark
    Longhurst, James
    Pontin, John
    Stephenson, Wendy
    Brooks, Joss
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 24 : 253 - 260
  • [46] Could Payments for Ecosystem Services Create an "Ecosystem Service Curse"?
    Kronenberg, Jakub
    Hubacek, Klaus
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [47] The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services
    Salzman, James
    Bennett, Genevieve
    Carroll, Nathaniel
    Goldstein, Allie
    Jenkins, Michael
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (03): : 136 - 144
  • [48] Scaling participation in payments for ecosystem services programs
    Sorice, Michael G.
    Josh Donlan, C.
    Boyle, Kevin J.
    Xu, Weibin
    Gelcich, Stefan
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [49] Farmers' perspectives on payments for ecosystem services in Uganda
    Geussens, K.
    Van den Broeck, G.
    Vanderhaegen, K.
    Verbist, B.
    Maertens, M.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 84 : 316 - 327
  • [50] Payments for ecosystem services in developing world fisheries
    Bladon, Annabelle J.
    Short, Katherine M.
    Mohammed, Essam Yassin
    Milner-Gulland, E. J.
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2016, 17 (03) : 839 - 859