Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the face of external biophysical stressors

被引:46
|
作者
Friess, Daniel A. [1 ]
Phelps, Jacob [2 ]
Garmendia, Eneko [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Geog, Singapore 117570, Singapore
[2] Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, Jalan CIFOR, Sindang Barang 16115, Bogor, Indonesia
[3] Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Bilbao 48008, Bizkaia, Spain
[4] Ikerbasque, Basque Fdn Sci, Bilbao 48008, Spain
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England
[6] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
关键词
Blue carbon; Ecosystem stability; Permanence; REDD; Regime shift; Transaction costs; INVASIVE ALIEN PLANTS; SEA-LEVEL RISE; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CORAL-REEFS; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION; MISSISSIPPI DELTA; SOUTH-AFRICA; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Economic instruments such as Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes are increasingly promoted to protect ecosystems (and their associated ecosystem services) that are threatened by processes of local and global change. Biophysical stressors external to a PES site, such as forest fires, pollution, sea level rise, and ocean acidification, may undermine ecosystem stability and sustained ecosystem service provision, yet their threats and impacts are difficult to account for within PES scheme design. We present a typology of external biophysical stressors, characterizing them in terms of stressor origin, spatial domain and temporal scale. We further analyse how external stressors can potentially impinge on key PES parameters, as they (1) threaten ecosystem service provision, additionality and permanence, (2) add challenges to the identification of PES providers and beneficiaries, and (3) add complexity and costs to PES mechanism design. Effective PES implementation under external stressors requires greater emphasis on the evaluation and mitigation of external stressors, and further instruments that can accommodate associated risks and uncertainties. A greater understanding of external stressors will increase our capacity to design multi-scale instruments to conserve important ecosystems in times of environmental change. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 42
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PES Payments for ecosystem services and poverty alleviation?
    Menton, Mary
    Bennett, Aoife
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION: TRADE-OFFS AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, : 189 - 203
  • [2] Neoliberal performatives and the 'making' of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES)
    Kolinjivadi, Vijay
    Van Hecken, Gert
    Vela Almeida, Diana
    Dupras, Jerome
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (01) : 3 - 25
  • [3] The political dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Cascade or stairway?
    Hausknost, Daniel
    Grima, Nelson
    Singh, Simron Jit
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 131 : 109 - 118
  • [4] Estimating residents' WTP for ecosystem services improvement in a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program: A choice experiment approach
    Ureta, J. Carl
    Motallebi, Marzieh
    Vassalos, Michael
    Seagle, Steven
    Baldwin, Robert
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [5] Economic Experiments for Collective Action in the Kyrgyz Republic: Lessons for Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES)
    Kolinjivadi, Vijay
    Charre, Simon
    Adamowski, Jan
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 156 : 489 - 498
  • [6] Determinants of the environmental conservation and poverty alleviation objectives of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs
    Ola, Oreoluwa
    Menapace, Luisa
    Benjamin, Emmanuel
    Lang, Hannes
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 35 : 52 - 66
  • [7] Recasting payments for ecosystem services (PES) in water resource management: A novel institutional approach
    Kolinjivadi, Vijay
    Adamowski, Jan
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 10 : 144 - 154
  • [8] The practice of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the Tropical Andes: Evidence from program administrators
    Bauchet, Jonathan
    Asquith, Nigel
    Ma, Zhao
    Radel, Claudia
    Godoy, Ricardo
    Zanotti, Laura
    Steele, Diana
    Gramig, Benjamin M.
    Chong, Andrea Estrella
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 45
  • [9] Why do farmers join Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes? An Assessment of PES water scheme participation in Brazil
    Zanella, Matheus A.
    Schleyer, Christian
    Speelman, Stijn
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 105 : 166 - 176
  • [10] Institutional challenges for corporate participation in payments for ecosystem services (PES): insights from Southeast Asia
    Benjamin S. Thompson
    Sustainability Science, 2018, 13 : 919 - 935