Conditional and Continuous Electrical Stimulation Increase Cystometric Capacity in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

被引:48
|
作者
Horvath, Eric E. [1 ]
Yoo, Paul B. [1 ]
Amundsen, Cindy L. [2 ]
Webster, George D. [3 ]
Grill, Warren M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Urogynecol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Urol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
biofeedback; electromyogram; neural prosthesis; neurogenic detrusor overactivity; neuromodulation; overactive bladder; urinary incontinence; NEUROGENIC DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY; DORSAL PENILE/CLITORAL NERVE; BLADDER CONTRACTIONS; NEUROMODULATION; SPHINCTER; REFLEX; HYPERREFLEXIA; DYSFUNCTION; INHIBITION; CAT;
D O I
10.1002/nau.20766
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) exhibit neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) causing high intravesicle pressures and incontinence. The first aim was to measure changes in maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) evoked by electrical stimulation of the dorsal genital nerve (DGN) delivered either continuously or conditionally (only during bladder contractions) in persons with SCI. The second aim was to use the external anal sphincter electromyogram (EMG(EAS)) for real-time control of conditional stimulation. Methods: Serial filling cystometries were performed in nine volunteers with complete or incomplete supra-sacral SCI. Conditional stimulation was delivered automatically when detrusor pressure increased to 8-12 cmH(2)O above baseline. MCCs were measured for each treatment (continuous, conditional, and no stimulation) and compared using post-ANOVA Tukey HSD paired comparisons. Additional treatments in two subjects used the EMG(EAS) for automatic control of conditional stimulation. Results: Continuous and conditional stimulation increased MCC by 63 +/- 73 ml (36 +/- 24%) and 74 +/- 71 ml (51 +/- 37%), respectively (P < 0.05), compared to no stimulation. There was no significant difference between MCCs for conditional and continuous stimulation, but conditional stimulation significantly reduced stimulation time (174 +/- 154 sec, or 27 +/- 17% of total time) as compared to continuous stimulation (469 269 sec, 100% of total time, P < 0.001). The EMG(EAS) algorithm provided reliable detection of bladder contractions (six of six contractions over four trials) and reduced stimulation time (21 +/- 8% of total time). Conclusions: Conditional stimulation generates increases in bladder capacity while substantially reducing stimulation time. Furthermore, EMG(EAS) was successfully used as a real-time feedback signal to control conditional electrical stimulation in a laboratory setting. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:401-407, 2010. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 407
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Electrical stimulation for therapy and mobility after spinal cord injury
    Stein, RB
    Chong, SL
    James, KB
    Kido, A
    Bell, GJ
    Tubman, LA
    Bélanger, M
    SPINAL CORD TRAUMA: REGENERATION, NEURAL REPAIR AND FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY, 2002, 137 : 27 - 34
  • [22] Electrical Stimulation Exercise Recommendations for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
    Dolbow, David R.
    Gorgey, Ashraf S.
    Sutor, Tommy W.
    Musselman, Kristin
    Bochkezanian, Vanesa
    Davis, Glen M.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 104 (05): : 847 - 851
  • [23] A Review of Functional Electrical Stimulation Treatment in Spinal Cord Injury
    Shiyu Luo
    Haonan Xu
    Yi Zuo
    Xiaogang Liu
    Angelo H. All
    NeuroMolecular Medicine, 2020, 22 : 447 - 463
  • [24] Electrical stimulation and denervated muscles after spinal cord injury
    Chandrasekaran, Subhalakshmi
    Davis, John
    Bersch, Ines
    Goldberg, Gary
    Gorgey, Ashraf S.
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (08) : 1397 - 1407
  • [25] Predictive Framework for Electrical Stimulation Cycling in Spinal Cord Injury
    Cardoso de Sousa, Ana Carolina
    Font-Llagunes, Josep M.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2024, 58 (24): : 332 - 337
  • [26] Functional electrical stimulation therapies after spinal cord injury
    Gater, David R., Jr.
    Dolbow, David
    Tsui, Britney
    Gorgey, Ashraf S.
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2011, 28 (03) : 231 - 248
  • [27] A Review of Functional Electrical Stimulation Treatment in Spinal Cord Injury
    Luo, Shiyu
    Xu, Haonan
    Zuo, Yi
    Liu, Xiaogang
    All, Angelo H.
    NEUROMOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (04) : 447 - 463
  • [28] Interleaved neuromuscular electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury
    Bergquist, Austin J.
    Wiest, Matheus J.
    Okuma, Yoshino
    Collins, David F.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2017, 56 (05) : 989 - 993
  • [29] Electrical stimulation and denervated muscles after spinal cord injury
    Subhalakshmi Chandrasekaran
    John Davis
    Ines Bersch
    Gary Goldberg
    Ashraf S.Gorgey
    Neural Regeneration Research, 2020, 15 (08) : 1397 - 1407
  • [30] Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in People with Spinal Cord Injury
    Bochkezanian, Vanesa
    Newton, Robert U.
    Trajano, Gabriel S.
    Blazevich, Anthony J.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2018, 50 (09): : 1733 - 1739