Conditional and Continuous Electrical Stimulation Increase Cystometric Capacity in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

被引:48
|
作者
Horvath, Eric E. [1 ]
Yoo, Paul B. [1 ]
Amundsen, Cindy L. [2 ]
Webster, George D. [3 ]
Grill, Warren M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Urogynecol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Urol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
biofeedback; electromyogram; neural prosthesis; neurogenic detrusor overactivity; neuromodulation; overactive bladder; urinary incontinence; NEUROGENIC DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY; DORSAL PENILE/CLITORAL NERVE; BLADDER CONTRACTIONS; NEUROMODULATION; SPHINCTER; REFLEX; HYPERREFLEXIA; DYSFUNCTION; INHIBITION; CAT;
D O I
10.1002/nau.20766
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) exhibit neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) causing high intravesicle pressures and incontinence. The first aim was to measure changes in maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) evoked by electrical stimulation of the dorsal genital nerve (DGN) delivered either continuously or conditionally (only during bladder contractions) in persons with SCI. The second aim was to use the external anal sphincter electromyogram (EMG(EAS)) for real-time control of conditional stimulation. Methods: Serial filling cystometries were performed in nine volunteers with complete or incomplete supra-sacral SCI. Conditional stimulation was delivered automatically when detrusor pressure increased to 8-12 cmH(2)O above baseline. MCCs were measured for each treatment (continuous, conditional, and no stimulation) and compared using post-ANOVA Tukey HSD paired comparisons. Additional treatments in two subjects used the EMG(EAS) for automatic control of conditional stimulation. Results: Continuous and conditional stimulation increased MCC by 63 +/- 73 ml (36 +/- 24%) and 74 +/- 71 ml (51 +/- 37%), respectively (P < 0.05), compared to no stimulation. There was no significant difference between MCCs for conditional and continuous stimulation, but conditional stimulation significantly reduced stimulation time (174 +/- 154 sec, or 27 +/- 17% of total time) as compared to continuous stimulation (469 269 sec, 100% of total time, P < 0.001). The EMG(EAS) algorithm provided reliable detection of bladder contractions (six of six contractions over four trials) and reduced stimulation time (21 +/- 8% of total time). Conclusions: Conditional stimulation generates increases in bladder capacity while substantially reducing stimulation time. Furthermore, EMG(EAS) was successfully used as a real-time feedback signal to control conditional electrical stimulation in a laboratory setting. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:401-407, 2010. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 407
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conditional stimulatzion of the dorsal penile/clitoral nerve may increase cystometric capacity in patients with spinal cord injury
    Dalmose, AL
    Rijkhoff, NJM
    Kirkeby, HJ
    Nohr, M
    Sinkjaer, T
    Djurhuus, JC
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2003, 22 (02) : 130 - 137
  • [2] Electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury
    Sadowsky, CL
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2001, 16 (03) : 165 - 169
  • [3] Metabolic Responses to Endurance Electrical Stimulation Training in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury
    Erickson, Melissa L.
    Backus, Deborah
    McCully, Kevin K.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2015, 47 (05): : 631 - 632
  • [4] Mitochondrial Responses to Endurance Electrical Stimulation Training in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury
    Erickson, Melissa L.
    Reynolds, Mary Ann
    McCully, Kevin K.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2014, 46 (05): : 758 - 759
  • [5] Epidural electrical stimulation for spinal cord injury
    Choi, Elliot H.
    Gattas, Sandra
    Brown, Nolan J.
    Hong, John D.
    Limbo, Joshua N.
    Chan, Alvin Y.
    Oh, Michael Y.
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (12) : 2367 - 2375
  • [6] Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury
    Bochkezanian V
    Newton RU
    Trajano GS
    中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40 (11) : 853 - 853
  • [7] Functional Electrical Stimulation and Spinal Cord Injury
    Ho, Chester H.
    Triolo, Ronald J.
    Elias, Anastasia L.
    Kilgore, Kevin L.
    DiMarco, Anthony F.
    Bogie, Kath
    Vette, Albert H.
    Audu, Musa L.
    Kobetic, Rudi
    Chang, Sarah R.
    Chan, K. Ming
    Dukelow, Sean
    Bourbeau, Dennis J.
    Brose, Steven W.
    Gustafson, Kenneth J.
    Kiss, Zelma H. T.
    Mushahwar, Vivian K.
    PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (03) : 631 - +
  • [8] Epidural electrical stimulation for spinal cord injury
    Elliot H.Choi
    Sandra Gattas
    Nolan J.Brown
    John D.Hong
    Joshua N.Limbo
    Alvin Y.Chan
    Michael Y.Oh
    Neural Regeneration Research, 2021, 16 (12) : 2367 - 2375
  • [9] Case Report: Mitochondrial Responses To Endurance Electrical Stimulation Training In Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
    Erickson, Melissa L.
    Ryan, Terence E.
    Young, Hui-Ju
    McCully, Kevin K.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 177 - 177
  • [10] Functional magnetic stimulation of the colon in persons with spinal cord injury
    Lin, VW
    Nino-Murcia, M
    Frost, F
    Wolfe, V
    Hsiao, I
    Perkash, I
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (02): : 167 - 173