Film-screen artefact detection in mammograms

被引:0
|
作者
Ancelin, B [1 ]
Yam, M [1 ]
Highnam, RP [1 ]
Brady, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Mirada Solut Ltd, Oxford Ctr Innovat, Oxford OX2 0JX, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Shot noise is the result of "foreign bodies" such as dust or hairs being present on the intensifying screen or on the film during the acquisition. Shot noise is an important potential source of false positives in the detection of micro-calcifications. As such, there has been interest in its detection and labelling which is the aim of the work in this paper. In this paper, we give a clearer and better mathematical justification for our previous work in this area which uses the inherent blur in the imaging system to identify what is noise and what is real calcification. In doing so, we develop a new algorithm with a more mathematically correct approach which is iterative. This ensures that not only are individual pixels correctly marked as shot noise, but the whole area of noise is marked as such. The new algorithm due to its iterative nature is slower than the old method, but reduces the number of false positives even further in subsequent CAD algorithms by being based on firmer theory and detecting the whole noise region.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 178
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Why Does It Take Longer to Read Digital Than Film-Screen Screening Mammograms? A Partial Explanation
    Tamara Miner Haygood
    Jihong Wang
    Deanna Lane
    Eva Galvan
    E. Neely Atkinson
    Tanya Stephens
    Gary J. Whitman
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2010, 23 : 170 - 180
  • [22] FILM-SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY - COMPARISON OF VIEWS
    BASSETT, LW
    BUNNELL, DH
    GOLD, RH
    JAHANSHAHI, R
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 81 (04) : 391 - 394
  • [23] FILM-SCREEN SPEED SYSTEM CONSIDERATIONS
    HOLLAND, RS
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS, 1984, 486 : 84 - 91
  • [24] FILM-SCREEN TECHNIQUES FOR INTRAVENOUS ANGIOGRAPHY
    SCHWENKER, RP
    WAYRYNEN, RE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 139 (02) : 425 - 425
  • [25] WHAT IS THE TRUE FILM-SCREEN SENSITIVITY
    WARRENFORWARD, HM
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1995, 57 (1-4) : 301 - 304
  • [26] COMPARISON OF A NEW DUAL CHARACTERISTIC FILM-SCREEN SYSTEM (INSIGHT) WITH A STANDARD FILM-SCREEN SYSTEM FOR CHEST RADIOLOGY
    LOGAN, PM
    TUNNEY, T
    MCCOY, CT
    MASTERSON, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (794): : 162 - 165
  • [27] INFLUENCE OF FILM AND PROCESSING ON FILM-SCREEN IMAGE NOISE
    HOLLAND, RS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 139 (02) : 425 - 425
  • [28] INFLUENCE OF FILM AND PROCESSING ON FILM-SCREEN IMAGE NOISE
    HOLLAND, RS
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS, 1982, 347 : 54 - 61
  • [29] THE SENSITIVITY OF FILM-SCREEN COMBINATIONS IN MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS
    HE, GQ
    HOESCHEN, D
    MIRANDE, W
    FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NUKLEARMEDIZIN, 1982, 137 (06): : 718 - 723
  • [30] FILM-SCREEN SHARPNESS IN COMPLEX MOTION TOMOGRAPHY
    WAYRYNEN, RE
    HOLLAND, RS
    SCHWENKER, RP
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1977, 12 (02) : 195 - 198