Predicting events in clinical trials using two time-to-event outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Mu, Rongji [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Stat, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
change point; convolution; event prediction; overall survival; progression-free survival; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; SURROGATE; HAZARD; MODEL; ASSOCIATION; DEPENDENCE;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.201700083
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes, it is of interest to predict when a prespecified number of events can be reached. Interim analysis is conducted to estimate the underlying survival function. When another correlated time-to-event endpoint is available, both outcome variables can be used to improve estimation efficiency. In this paper, we propose to use the convolution of two time-to-event variables to estimate the survival function of interest. Propositions and examples are provided based on exponential models that accommodate possible change points. We further propose a new estimation equation about the expected time that exploits the relationship of two endpoints. Simulations and the analysis of real data show that the proposed methods with bivariate information yield significant improvement in prediction over that of the univariate method.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 826
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Designs for clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes based on stopping guidelines for lack of benefit
    Patrick Royston
    Friederike M-S Barthel
    Mahesh KB Parmar
    Babak Choodari-Oskooei
    Valerie Isham
    Trials, 12
  • [22] Bayesian design of clinical trials with multiple time-to-event outcomes subject to functional cure
    Cho, Seoyoon
    Psioda, Matthew A.
    Ibrahim, Joseph G.
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2025,
  • [23] Estimation of ascertainment bias and its effect on power in clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes
    Greene, Erich J.
    Peduzzi, Peter
    Dziura, James
    Meng, Can
    Miller, Michael E.
    Travison, Thomas G.
    Esserman, Denise
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (05) : 1306 - 1320
  • [24] On selecting the critical boundary functions in group-sequential trials with two time-to-event outcomes
    Hamasaki, Toshimitsu
    Hung, H. M. James
    Hsiao, Chin-Fu
    Evans, Scott R.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 101
  • [25] Milestone prediction for time-to-event endpoint monitoring in clinical trials
    Ou, Fang-Shu
    Heller, Martin
    Shi, Qian
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2019, 18 (04) : 433 - 446
  • [26] Bayesian design of clinical trials using joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Xu, Jiawei
    Psioda, Matthew A.
    Ibrahim, Joseph G.
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2022, 23 (02) : 591 - 608
  • [27] On the estimation of intracluster correlation for time-to-event outcomes in cluster randomized trials
    Kalia, Sumeet
    Klar, Neil
    Donner, Allan
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (30) : 5551 - 5560
  • [28] Interpretation of time-to-event outcomes in randomized trials: an online randomized experiment
    Weir, I. R.
    Marshall, G. D.
    Schneider, J. I.
    Sherer, J. A.
    Lord, E. M.
    Gyawali, B.
    Paasche-Orlow, M. K.
    Benjamin, E. J.
    Trinquart, L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (01) : 96 - 102
  • [29] An Introduction to Deep Survival Analysis Models for Predicting Time-to-Event Outcomes
    Chen, George H.
    FOUNDATIONS AND TRENDS IN MACHINE LEARNING, 2024, 17 (06): : 921 - 1100
  • [30] Modeling injury outcomes using time-to-event methods
    Clark, DE
    Ryan, LM
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1997, 42 (06): : 1129 - 1134