Kinetic model discrimination on the biogas production in thermophilic co-digestion of sugarcane vinasse and water hyacinth

被引:5
|
作者
Chai, Audrey [1 ]
Wong, Yee-Shian [1 ,2 ]
Ong, Soon-An [1 ,2 ]
Lutpi, Nabilah Aminah [1 ,2 ]
Sam, Sung-Ting [3 ]
Kee, Wei-Chin [1 ]
Eng, Kim-Mun [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Fac Civil Engn Technol, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Ctr Excellence WAREG, Water Res & Environm Sustainabil Growth, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
[3] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Fac Chem Engn Technol, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
[4] Kenep Resources Asia Sdn Bhd, Taman Perind Ringan Jelapang Maju, Ipoh 30020, Perak, Malaysia
关键词
Akaike criterion information (AIC); Aquatic waste; Biological wastewater treatment; Distillery wastewater; Industrial effluent; Kinetic study; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; INOCULUM/SUBSTRATE RATIO; METHANE PRODUCTION; MANURE; WASTE; DAIRY; PRETREATMENT; STILLAGE; SLUDGE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-20251-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Co-digestion between sugarcane vinasse (Vn) and water hyacinth (WH) at various mixing ratios of 0:1, 1:0, 1:3, 3:1, and 1:1 was carried out under thermophilic conditions (55 degrees C) for 60 days. The effect of various mixing ratios on the pH changes, soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD) reduction, and cumulative biogas production was investigated. The first order, modified Gompertz, and logistic function kinetic models were selected to fit the experimental data. Model discrimination was conducted through the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The study revealed that co-digestion shows better performance compared to the mono-digestion of both substrates. Vn:WH mixing ratio 1:1 with inoculum to substrate ratio (ISR) of 0.38 g VSinoculum/g VSsubstrate is the most favorable ratio, achieving sCOD reduction efficiency and cumulative biogas production of 71.6% and 1229 mL, respectively. Model selection through AIC revealed that ratio 1:1 was best fitted to the logistic function kinetic model (R-2 = 0.9897) with Y-m and K values of 1232 mL and 31 mL/day, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:61298 / 61306
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anaerobic co-digestion of biogas effluent and sugarcane filter cake for methane production
    Wongarmat, Worapong
    Reungsang, Alissara
    Sittijunda, Sureewan
    Chu, Chen-Yeon
    Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2022, 12 (03): : 901 - 912
  • [22] Biogas Production from Co-Digestion Vinasse Waste and Tofu-Processing Wastewater and Kinetics
    Syaichurrozi, Iqbal
    Rusdi
    Dwicahyanto, Sharfan
    Toron, Yustinus Selis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, 2016, 6 (03): : 1057 - 1070
  • [23] Anaerobic co-digestion of sugarcane press mud with vinasse on methane yield
    Lopez Gonzalez, Lisbet Mailin
    Pereda Reyes, Ileana
    Romero Romero, Osvaldo
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 68 : 139 - 145
  • [24] Biohydrogen production from co-digestion of sugarcane vinasse and bagasse using anaerobic dark fermentation
    Rashidi, Majid
    Alavi, Nadali
    Amereh, Fatemeh
    Rafiee, Mohammad
    Amanidaz, Nazak
    Partovi, Khashayar
    Mosanefi, Shole
    Bakhshoodeh, Reza
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 25
  • [25] Biogas production and methanogenic archaeal community in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion processes
    Yu, D.
    Kurola, J. M.
    Lahde, K.
    Kymalainen, M.
    Sinkkonen, A.
    Romantschuk, M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 143 : 54 - 60
  • [26] Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of Prosopis juliflora pods with water hyacinth, dry leaves, and cow manure
    Prabhu, A. Vijin
    Manimaran, R.
    Raja, S. Antony
    Jeba, P.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2020, 42 (03) : 375 - 386
  • [27] Experimental and kinetic studies on co-digestion of agrifood and sewage sludge for biogas production
    Rani, Punam
    Bansal, Megha
    Pathak, Vinayak V.
    Ahmad, Shamshad
    JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE, 2022, 16 (01): : 147 - 154
  • [28] Screening co-digestion of food waste water with manure for biogas production
    Liu, Yan
    Miller, Steve A.
    Safferman, Steven I.
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2009, 3 (01): : 11 - 19
  • [29] Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Water Hyacinth and Sheep Waste
    Patil, Jagadish H.
    AntonyRaj, M. A. L.
    Shankar, B. B.
    Shetty, Mahesh Kumar
    Kumar, B. P. Pradeep
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES (2013 AEDCEE), 2014, 52 : 572 - 578
  • [30] Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle rumen content and food waste for biogas production: Establishment of co-digestion ratios and kinetic studies
    Ihoeghian, Newton A.
    Amenaghawon, Andrew N.
    Ajieh, Mike U.
    Oshoma, Cyprian E.
    Ogofure, Abraham
    Erhunmwunse, Nosakhare O.
    Edosa, Valerie I. O.
    Tongo, Isioma
    Obuekwe, Ifeyinwa S.
    Isagba, Ebuwa S.
    Emokaro, Christopher
    Ezemonye, Lawrence I. N.
    Lag-Brotons, Alfonso J.
    Semple, Kirk T.
    Martin, Alastair D.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 18