Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (ASPECT-NP): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

被引:237
|
作者
Kollef, Marin H. [1 ]
Novacek, Martin [2 ]
Kivistik, Ulo [3 ]
Rea-Neto, Alvaro [4 ]
Shime, Nobuaki [5 ]
Martin-Loeches, Ignacio [6 ,7 ]
Timsit, Jean-Francois [8 ]
Wunderink, Richard G. [9 ]
Bruno, Christopher J. [10 ]
Huntington, Jennifer A. [10 ]
Lin, Gina [10 ]
Yu, Brian [10 ]
Butterton, Joan R. [10 ]
Rhee, Elizabeth G. [10 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Gen Hosp Kolin, Kolin, Czech Republic
[3] North Estonia Med Ctr, Tallinn, Estonia
[4] Univ Fed Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[5] Hiroshima Univ, Hiroshima, Japan
[6] St James Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Univ Barcelona, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi i Sunyer, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Resp, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Univ Paris Diderot, Paris, France
[9] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[10] Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ USA
来源
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES | 2019年 / 19卷 / 12期
关键词
ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; TIGECYCLINE; PHARMACOKINETICS; INFECTIONS; PREVALENCE; PATHOGENS;
D O I
10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30403-7
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background Nosocomial pneumonia due to antimicrobial-resistant pathogens is associated with high mortality. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination antibacterial drug ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia. Methods We conducted a randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial at 263 hospitals in 34 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, were undergoing mechanical ventilation, and had nosocomial pneumonia (either ventilator-associated pneumonia or ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with block randomisation (block size four), stratified by type of nosocomial pneumonia and age (<65 years vs >= 65 years), to receive either 3 g ceftolozane-tazobactam or 1 g meropenem intravenously every 8 h for 8-14 days. The primary endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality (at a 10% non-inferiority margin). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (7-14 days after the end of therapy; 12.5% non-inferiority margin). Both endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Investigators, study staff, patients, and patients' representatives were masked to treatment assignment. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received study treatment. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02070757. Findings Between Jan 16, 2015, and April 27, 2018, 726 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 362 to the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 364 to the meropenem group. Overall, 519 (71%) patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia, 239 (33%) had Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores of at least 20, and 668 (92%) were in the intensive care unit. At 28 days, 87 (24.0%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 92 (25.3%) in the meropenem group had died (weighted treatment difference 1.1% [95% CI -5.1 to 7.4]). At the test-of-cure visit 197 (54%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 194 (53%) in the meropenem group were clinically cured (weighted treatment difference 1.1% [95% CI -6.2 to 8.3]). Ceftolozane-tazobactam was thus non-inferior to meropenem in terms of both 28-day all-cause mortality and clinical cure at test of cure. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 38 (11%) of 361 patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 27 (8%) of 359 in the meropenem group. Eight (2%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and two (1%) in the meropenem group had serious treatment-related adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation High-dose ceftolozane-tazobactam is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment for Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, a high-risk, critically ill population. Funding Merck & Co. Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1311
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Posaconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis: a phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Maertens, Johan A.
    Rahav, Galia
    Lee, Dong-Gun
    Ponce-de-Leon, Alfredo
    Ramirez Sanchez, Isabel Cristina
    Klimko, Nikolay
    Sonet, Anne
    Haider, Shariq
    Diego Velez, Juan
    Raad, Issam
    Koh, Liang-Piu
    Karthaus, Meinolf
    Zhou, Jianying
    Ben-Ami, Ronen
    Motyl, Mary R.
    Han, Seongah
    Grandhi, Anjana
    Waskin, Hetty
    LANCET, 2021, 397 (10273): : 499 - 509
  • [22] Cadazolid for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: results of two double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trials
    Gerding, Dale N.
    Cornely, Oliver A.
    Grill, Simon
    Kracker, Hilke
    Marrast, Anne Claire
    Nord, Carl Erik
    Talbot, George H.
    Buitrago, Martha
    Diaconescu, Iulian Gheorghe
    de Oliveira, Claudia Murta
    Preotescu, Liliana
    Pullman, John
    Louie, Thomas J.
    Wilcox, Mark H.
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 19 (03): : 265 - 274
  • [23] Surotomycin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection: Phase 2, randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority, multicentre trial
    Lee, Christine H.
    Patino, Hernando
    Stevens, Chris
    Rege, Shruta
    Chesnel, Laurent
    Louie, Thomas
    Mullane, Kathleen M.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 71 (10) : 2964 - 2971
  • [24] Mexiletine versus lamotrigine in non-dystrophic myotonias: a randomised, double-blind, head-to-head, crossover, non-inferiority, phase 3trial
    Vivekanandam, Vinojini
    Skorupinska, Iwona
    Jayaseelan, Dipa L.
    Matthews, Emma
    Barohn, Richard J.
    Mcdermott, Michael P.
    Hanna, Michael G.
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2024, 23 (10): : 1004 - 1012
  • [25] Safety and immunogenicity of VPM1002 versus BCG in South African newborn babies: a randomised, phase 2 non-inferiority double-blind controlled trial
    Cotton, Mark F.
    Madhi, Shabir A.
    Luabeya, Angelique K.
    Tameris, Michele
    Hesseling, Anneke C.
    Shenje, Justin
    Schoeman, Elisma
    Hatherill, Mark
    Desai, Sajjad
    Kapse, Dhananjay
    Bruckner, Sina
    Koen, Anthonet
    Jose, Lisa
    Moultrie, Andrew
    Bhikha, Sutika
    Walzl, Gerhard
    Gutschmidt, Andrea
    Kotze, Leigh A.
    Allies, Devon L.
    Loxton, Andre G.
    Shaligram, Umesh
    Abraham, Maria
    Johnstone, Hilary
    Grode, Leander
    Kaufmann, S. H. E.
    Kulkarni, Prasad S.
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (10): : 1472 - 1483
  • [26] Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lacosamide monotherapy versus controlled-release carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
    Baulac, Michel
    Rosenow, Felix
    Toledo, Manuel
    Terada, Kiyohito
    Li, Ting
    De Backer, Marc
    Werhahn, Konrad
    Brock, Melissa
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2017, 16 (01): : 43 - 54
  • [27] A DOUBLE-BLIND, NON-INFERIORITY RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TRANSVAGINAL PROCEDURES FOR THE REPAIR OF A RECTOCELE
    Henn, E. W.
    Richter, B. W.
    Burger, D. A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 : S31 - S32
  • [28] Regular versus as-needed budesonide and formoterol combination treatment for moderate asthma: a non-inferiority, randomised, double-blind clinical trial
    Papi, Alberto
    Marku, Brunilda
    Scichilone, Nicola
    Maestrelli, Piero
    Paggiaro, Pierluigi
    Saetta, Marina
    Nava, Stefano
    Folletti, Ilenia
    Bertorelli, Giuseppina
    Bertacco, Stefano
    Contoli, Marco
    Plebani, Mario
    Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino
    Spanevello, Antonio
    Aliani, Maria
    Pannacci, Marco
    Morelli, Paolo
    Beghe, Bianca
    Fabbri, Leonardo M.
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (02): : 109 - 119
  • [29] Safety and efficacy of oral nemonoxacin versus levofloxacin in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Yuan, Jinyi
    Mo, Biwen
    Ma, Zhuang
    Lv, Yuan
    Cheng, Shih-Lung
    Yang, Yanping
    Tong, Zhaohui
    Wu, Renguang
    Sun, Shenghua
    Cao, Zhaolong
    Wu, Jufang
    Zhu, Demei
    Chang, Liwen
    Zhang, Yingyuan
    Zhao, Li
    Wang, Xiongbiao
    Wang, Xuefen
    Wang, Dexi
    Li, Xiangyang
    Peng, Yiqiang
    Liang, Yongjie
    Liu, Hua
    Xiao, Zuke
    Lv, Xiaoju
    Wu, Shiman
    Dai, Yuanrong
    Huang, Yijiang
    Hu, Zhenghong
    Qiu, Chen
    Li, Xi
    Zhang, Suiyang
    Li, Wenpu
    Liu, Shuang
    Shi, Yi
    Xiong, Chang
    Kuang, Jiulong
    Xiu, Qingyu
    Cui, Shehuai
    Li, Jianguo
    Lin, Qichang
    Huang, Wenxiang
    Wan, Yixin
    Li, Qimangu
    Shen, Ce
    Xiao, Yi
    Wu, Xiaoju
    Chuang, Yin Ching
    Perng, Wann Cherng
    Tsao, Shih-Ming
    Hsu, Jeng-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 52 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [30] Intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid versus oral cephalexin for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections: a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial
    Dalen, Dawn
    Fry, Amy
    Campbell, Samuel G.
    Eppler, Jeffrey
    Zed, Peter J.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (08) : 492 - 498