Relation between instant and light-front formulations of quantum field theory

被引:5
|
作者
Polyzou, W. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Phys & Astron, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
INFINITE-MOMENTUM FRAME; ZERO-MODE; RELATIVISTIC DYNAMICS; CLUSTER PROPERTIES; QUANTIZATION; MECHANICS; SCALAR; PARTICLES; SYMMETRY; VACUUM;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.103.105017
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The scattering equivalence of quantum field theories formulated with light-front and instant-form kinematic subgroups is established using nonperturbative methods. The difficulty with field theoretic formulations of Dirac's forms of dynamics is that the free and interacting unitary representations of the Poincare group are defined on inequivalent representations of the Hilbert space, which means that the concept of kinematic transformations must be modified on the Hilbert space of the field theory. This work addresses this problem by assuming the existence of a field theory with the expected properties and constructs equivalent representations with instant and front-form kinematic subgroups. The underlying field theory is not initially associated with an instant form or light-front form of the dynamics. In this construction the existence of a vacuum and one-particle mass eigenstates is assumed and both the light-front and instant-form representations are constructed to share the same vacuum and one-particle states. If there is spontaneous symmetry breaking there will be a 0 mass particle in the mass spectrum (assuming no Higgs mechanism). The free field Fock space plays no role. There is no "quantization" of a classical theory. The property that survives from the perturbative approach is the notion of a kinematic subgroup, which means kinematic Poincar ' e transformations can be trivially implemented by acting on suitable basis vectors. This nonperturbative approach avoids dealing with issues that arise in perturbative treatments where is it necessary to have a consistent treatment of renormalization, rotational covariance, and the structure of the light-front vacuum. While addressing these issues in a computational framework is the most important unanswered question for applications, this work may provide some insight into the nature of the expected resolution and identifies the origin of some of differences between the perturbative and nonperturbative approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Equivalence of light-front quantization and instant-time quantization
    Mannheim, Philip D.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2020, 102 (02):
  • [42] Gauge field divergences in the light-front
    Pimentel, BM
    Sales, JHO
    HADRON PHYSICS 2002: TOPICS ON THE STRUCTURE AND INTERACTION OF HADRONIC SYSTEMS, 2003, : 211 - 214
  • [43] Hamiltonian light-front field theory within an AdS/QCD basis
    Vary, J. P.
    Honkanen, H.
    Li, Jun
    Maris, P.
    Brodsky, S. J.
    Harindranath, A.
    de Teramond, G. F.
    Sternberg, P.
    Ng, E. G.
    Yang, C.
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B-PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 199 : 64 - 73
  • [44] Hamiltonian Light-Front Field Theory: Recent Progress and Tantalizing Prospects
    Vary, J. P.
    FEW-BODY SYSTEMS, 2012, 52 (3-4) : 331 - 338
  • [45] Solvable Models in the Conventional and Light-Front Field Theory: Recent Progress
    L’ubomír Martinovic̆
    Few-Body Systems, 2014, 55 : 527 - 534
  • [46] Relation between equal-time and light-front wave functions
    Miller, Gerald A.
    Tiburzi, Brian C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2010, 81 (03):
  • [47] Light-front nuclear physics: Mean field theory for finite nuclei
    Blunden, PG
    Burkardt, M
    Miller, GA
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1999, 60 (05) : 18
  • [48] Weyl gauge, Schwinger terms and bosonization in light-front field theory
    Martinovic, L
    Vary, JP
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B-PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTS, 2002, 108 : 176 - 179
  • [49] Hamiltonian Light-Front Field Theory: Recent Progress and Tantalizing Prospects
    J. P. Vary
    Few-Body Systems, 2012, 52 : 331 - 338
  • [50] Systematic renormalization in Hamiltonian light-front field theory: The massive generalization
    Kylin, RD
    Allen, BH
    Perry, RJ
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1999, 60 (06)