Evaluation of implant alignment in navigated unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : a comparison of 2D and 3D imaging

被引：0
|
作者：
Ishida, Kazunari [1 ]
Toda, Akihiko [1 ]
Shibanuma, Nao [1 ]
Matsumoto, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Kuroda, Ryosuke [1 ]
Kurosaka, Masahiro [1 ]
机构：
[1] Kobe Kaisei Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Nada Ku, 3-11-15 Shinohara Kita, Kobe, Hyogo 6570068, Japan
来源：
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA | 2015年 / 81卷 / 04期
关键词：
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; implant alignment; three-dimensional evaluation; radiographic evaluation; ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT; ANTEROPOSTERIOR AXIS; FEMORAL COMPONENT; LIMB ALIGNMENT; KINEMATICS;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
This study aimed to compare two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) methods for evaluating implant alignment in navigated UKA. Nineteen UKAs in 18 subjects (7 men) were performed using an image-free navigation system. Coronal and sagittal implant alignments were assessed using radiographs (2D evaluation) and 3D image-matching software. The accuracy of 2D evaluation was compared with that of 3D evaluation. A deviation >3 degrees from the 3D evaluation was defined as an outlier. In the 2D evaluation, outliers for the femoral component were observed in both the coronal plane (6/19 subjects) and the sagittal plane (3/19 subjects). In UKA, assessment of the implant position might be misjudged because of the design of the implant, especially for the femoral component; 3D methods are ideal for assessment of implant alignment.
引用
收藏
页码：654 / 661
页数：8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3 T system scientific research
    Milewski, Matthew D.
    Smitaman, Edward
    Moukaddam, Hicham
    Katz, Lee D.
    Essig, David A.
    Medvecky, Michael J.
    Haims, Andrew H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (07) : 1637 - 1643
  • [22] A seamless 2D/3D imaging workflow
    Quinlan, Kate
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2023, 234 (10) : 768 - 768
  • [23] A seamless 2D/3D imaging workflow
    British Dental Journal, 2023, 234 : 768 - 768
  • [24] The synthetic collimator for 2D and 3D imaging
    Clarkson, E
    Wilson, DW
    Barrett, HH
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 : 107 - 117
  • [25] Imaging 3D enzyme dynamics in 2D
    Nature Methods, 2018, 15 (1) : 16 - 16
  • [26] A comparison between 3D printed models and standard 2D planning in the use of metal block augments in revision knee arthroplasty
    Balato, Giovanni
    De Matteo, Vincenzo
    Guarino, Amedeo
    De Mauro, Domenico
    Baldi, Dario
    Cavaliere, Carlo
    Salvatore, Marco
    Citak, Mustafa
    Mariconda, Massimo
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2024, 35 (03): : 473 - 482
  • [27] Optofluidic lenses for 2D and 3D imaging
    Huang, Hanyang
    Zhao, Yi
    JOURNAL OF MICROMECHANICS AND MICROENGINEERING, 2019, 29 (07)
  • [28] Comparison of Modern 3D and 2D MR Imaging Sequences of the Wrist at 3 Tesla
    Rehnitz, C.
    Klaan, B.
    von Stillfried, F.
    Amarteifio, E.
    Burkholder, I.
    Kauczor, H. U.
    Weber, M. A.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2016, 188 (08): : 753 - 762
  • [29] Comparison of 2D and 3D gamma analyses
    Pulliam, Kiley B.
    Huang, Jessie Y.
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Followill, David
    Bosca, Ryan
    O'Daniel, Jennifer
    Kry, Stephen F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02) : 021710
  • [30] Paravaginal defects: a comparison of clinical examination and 2D/3D ultrasound imaging
    Dietz, HP
    Pang, S
    Korda, A
    Benness, C
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 45 (03): : 187 - 190
12345