Characterization of breast cancer subtypes based on quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

被引:27
|
作者
Kim, Jin Joo [1 ]
Kim, Jin You [1 ]
Suh, Hie Bum [1 ]
Hwangbo, Lee [1 ]
Lee, Nam Kyung [1 ]
Kim, Suk [1 ]
Lee, Ji Won [1 ]
Choo, Ki Seok [2 ]
Nam, Kyung Jin [2 ]
Kang, Taewoo [3 ]
Park, Heeseung [3 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Med Res Inst, Dept Radiol,Sch Med & Med Res Inst, 1-10 Ami Dong, Busan 602739, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Radiol, Yangsan Hosp, Yangsan, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Busan Canc Ctr, Busan, South Korea
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging classification; Kinetics; MOLECULAR SUBTYPES; TUMOR HETEROGENEITY; MRI; CLASSIFICATION; ASSOCIATION; COEFFICIENT; CARCINOMAS; MORPHOLOGY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-08166-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate whether intratumoral heterogeneity, assessed via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), reflects the molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancers. Material and methods We retrospectively evaluated data from 248 consecutive women (mean age +/- standard deviation, 54.6 +/- 12.2 years) with invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative DCE-MRI and DWI between 2019 and 2020. To evaluate intratumoral heterogeneity, kinetic heterogeneity (a measure of heterogeneity in the proportions of tumor pixels with delayed washout, plateau, and persistent components within a tumor) was assessed with DCE-MRI using a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were obtained using a region-of-interest technique, and ADC heterogeneity was calculated using the following formula: (ADC(max)-ADC(min))/ADC(mean). Possible associations between imaging-based heterogeneity values and breast cancer subtypes were analyzed. Results Of the 248 invasive breast cancers, 61 (24.6%) were classified as luminal A, 130 (52.4%) as luminal B, 25 (10.1%) as HER2-enriched, and 32 (12.9%) as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). There were significant differences in the kinetic and ADC heterogeneity values among tumor subtypes (p < 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively). The TNBC showed higher kinetic and ADC heterogeneity values, whereas the HER2-enriched subtype showed higher kinetic heterogeneity values compared to the luminal subtypes. Multivariate linear analysis showed that the HER2-enriched (p < 0.001) and TNBC subtypes (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher kinetic heterogeneity values. The TNBC subtype (p = 0.042) was also significantly associated with higher ADC heterogeneity values. Conclusions Quantitative assessments of heterogeneity in enhancement kinetics and ADC values may provide biological clues regarding the molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:822 / 833
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of papillary breast lesions
    Yildiz, Seyma
    Toprak, Huseyin
    Ersoy, Yeliz Emine
    Malya, Fatma Umit
    Bakan, Ayse Ahsen
    Aralasmak, Ayse
    Gucin, Zuhal
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (02): : 176 - 179
  • [22] BRAIN TUMORS A Multimodality Approach with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Brandao, Lara A.
    Shiroishi, Mark S.
    Law, Meng
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (02) : 199 - +
  • [23] Triple-negative invasive breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with other breast cancer subtypes
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    Son, Eun Ju
    Chung, Jin
    Kim, Jeong-Ah
    Kim, Eun-kyung
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (08) : 1724 - 1734
  • [24] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Magnetic Resonance in the Assessment of Peritoneal Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer in Patients with or Without BRCA Mutation
    Jankowska-Lombarska, Melania
    Grabowska-Derlatka, Laretta
    Kraj, Leszek
    Derlatka, Pawel
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (22)
  • [25] Triple-negative invasive breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with other breast cancer subtypes
    Ji Hyun Youk
    Eun Ju Son
    Jin Chung
    Jeong-Ah Kim
    Eun-kyung Kim
    European Radiology, 2012, 22 : 1724 - 1734
  • [26] Usefulness of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Transition-Zone Cancer
    Yoshizako, T.
    Wada, A.
    Hayashi, T.
    Uchida, K.
    Sumura, M.
    Uchida, N.
    Kitagaki, H.
    Igawa, M.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2008, 49 (10) : 1207 - 1213
  • [28] Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers
    Chen, Hui
    Li, Wei
    Wan, Chao
    Zhang, Jue
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [29] Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Characterization of the Index Lesion With Multiparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Patients
    Yuan, Qing
    Costa, Daniel N.
    Senegas, Julien
    Xi, Yin
    Wiethoff, Andrea J.
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    Roehrborn, Claus
    Lenkinski, Robert E.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (03) : 908 - 916
  • [30] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis
    Virostko, John
    Hainline, Allison
    Kang, Hakmook
    Arlinghaus, Lori R.
    Abramson, Richard G.
    Barnes, Stephanie L.
    Blume, Jeffrey D.
    Avery, Sarah
    Patt, Debra
    Goodgame, Boone
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    Sorace, Anna G.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 5 (01)