The VAGUS insight into psychosis scale - Self-report and clinician-rated versions

被引:43
|
作者
Gerretsen, Philip [1 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Remington, Gary [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Borlido, Carol [2 ]
Quilty, Lena [4 ,6 ]
Hassan, Sabrina [2 ]
Polsinelli, Gina [2 ]
Teo, Celine [2 ]
Mar, Wanna [1 ]
Simon, Regina [3 ]
Menon, Mahesh [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Pothier, David D. [5 ,6 ]
Nakajima, Shinichiro [1 ,3 ]
Caravaggio, Fernando [1 ,4 ]
Mamo, David C. [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Rajji, Tarek K. [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Mulsant, Benoit H. [3 ,4 ,6 ]
Deluca, Vincenzo [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Ganguli, Rohan [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Pollock, Bruce G. [3 ,4 ,6 ]
Graff-Guerrero, Ariel [1 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Res Imaging Ctr, Multimodal Imaging Grp, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[2] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Schizophrenia Program, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[3] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Div Geriatr Psychiat, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Campbell Family Mental Hlth Res Inst, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[7] Univ Malta, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Msida, Malta
[8] Univ Malta, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Psychiat, Msida, Malta
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Insight; Illness Awareness; Schizophrenia; Schizoaffective disorder; Symptom assessment; SCHIZOPHRENIA; ILLNESS; NUMBER; RTMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.005
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to develop self-report and clinician-rated versions of an insight scale that would be easy to administer, sensitive to small changes, and inclusive of the core dimensions of clinical insight into psychosis. Ten-item self-report (VAGUS-SR) and five-item clinician-rated (VAGUS-CR) scales were designed to measure the dimensions of insight into psychosis and evaluated in 215 and 140 participants, respectively (www.vagusonline.com). Tests of reliability and validity were performed. Both the VAGUS-SR and VAGUS-CR showed good internal consistency and reliability. They demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. Both versions were strongly correlated with one another and with the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight and Birchwood Insight Scale. Exploratory factor analyses identified three possible latent components of insight. The VAGUS-CR and VAGUS-SR are valid, reliable and easy to administer. They are build on previous insight scales with separate clinician-rated and self-report versions. The VAGUS-SR exhibited a multidimensional factor structure. Using a 10-point Likert scale for each item, the VAGUS has the capacity to detect small, temporally sensitive changes in insight, which is essential for intervention studies with neurostimulation or rapidly acting medications. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1089
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychosocial remission in schizophrenia: developing a clinician-rated scale
    Barak, Yoram
    Bleich, Avi
    Aizenberg, Dov
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 51 (01) : 94 - 98
  • [22] FACTOR STRUCTURE OF THE CLINICIAN-RATED DIMENSION OF PSYCHOSIS SYMPTOM SEVERITY IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY PSYCHOSIS
    Lee, Kyuyoung
    Kim, Yong Sik
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2020, 46 : S180 - S180
  • [23] Comparison between a researcher-rated and a self-report insight scale in chronic schizophrenia
    Young, D
    Jovanovski, D
    Zakzanis, K
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 18 (07) : 738 - 738
  • [24] Psychometric Properties of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale: Clinician-Administered and Self-Report Versions
    Wuyek, Lisa A.
    Antony, Martin M.
    McCabe, Randi E.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2011, 18 (03) : 234 - 243
  • [25] University of Toronto Insight Into Psychosis Scale (UTIP) - Self-Report & AMP; Rater Versions: A Novel, User Friendly Assessment Tool for the Measurement of Insight Into Psychosis in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
    Gerretsen, Philip
    Borlido, Carol
    Hassan, Sabrina
    Polsinelli, Gina
    Teo, Celine
    Mar, Wanna
    Simon, Regina
    Menon, Mahesh
    Pothier, David D.
    Rajji, Tarek K.
    Mulsant, Benoit
    Deluca, Vincenzo
    Ganguli, Rohan
    Remington, Gary
    Pollock, Bruce G.
    Graff-Guerrero, Ariel
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 73 (09) : 208S - 209S
  • [26] Factor Structure of the Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity in Patients with Schizophrenia
    Park, Seon-Cheol
    Lee, Kang Uk
    Choi, Joonho
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 13 (02) : 253 - 254
  • [27] Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms: A naturalistic study
    Dorz, S
    Borgherini, G
    Conforti, D
    Scarso, C
    Magni, G
    PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2004, 77 : 353 - 361
  • [28] Informant-rated clinical dementia rating scale: Comparison with the clinician-rated Clinical Dementia Rating scale
    Hake, AM
    Unverzagt, FW
    Hendrie, HC
    Farlow, MR
    NEUROLOGY, 1998, 50 (04) : A91 - A91
  • [29] Psychometric properties of the DSM-5 Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity
    Berendsen, S.
    van der Veen, N. M.
    van Tricht, M. J.
    de Haan, L.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2020, 216 : 416 - 421
  • [30] Self- and clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale: Evaluation in clinical practice
    Bondolfi, G.
    Jermann, F.
    Rouget, B. Weber
    Gex-Fabry, M.
    McQuillan, A.
    Dupont-Willemin, A.
    Aubry, J. -M.
    Nguyen, C.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2010, 121 (03) : 268 - 272