How persistent are unconventional monetary policy effects?

被引:9
|
作者
Neely, Christopher J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Reserve Bank St Louis, Box 442, St Louis, MO 63166 USA
关键词
Federal Reserve; Monetary policy; Quantitative easing; Large-scale asset purchase; VAR; Forecasting; Structural breaks; Good deal; SCALE ASSET PURCHASES; TERM STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL-CHANGE; FEDERAL-RESERVE; EXCESS RETURNS; INTEREST-RATES; PREDICTABILITY; MODELS; IMPACT; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102653
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The weight of the evidence indicates that unconventional monetary policy (UMP) shocks had persistent effects on yields. To make this point, this paper illustrates that the most influential SVAR model of UMP effects, which implies transient effects, exhibits structural instability, sensitivity to specification and single observations that render the conclusions unreliable. Restricted SVAR models that limit asset return predictability are more stable and imply that UMP shocks were persistent. This conclusion is consistent with evidence from micro studies, surveys of professional forecasters, and quantity-of-debt models. Estimates of the dynamic effects of shocks should respect the limited predictability in asset prices.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条