Comparative Study between the CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Multiplex Gene Editing in Maize

被引:13
|
作者
Gong, Chongzhi [1 ]
Huang, Shengchan [1 ]
Song, Rentao [2 ]
Qi, Weiwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Life Sci, Shanghai Key Lab Bioenergy Crops, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Natl Maize Improvement Ctr,Joint Int Res Lab Crop, State Key Lab Plant Physiol & Biochem,Beijing Key, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
multiplex gene editing; Cpf1; CRISPR/Cas; maize genetics; editing efficiency; GENOME; CRISPR-CAS9; CPF1; ENDONUCLEASE; NUCLEASES; CLEAVAGE; BACTERIA; COMPLEX; RICE; RNAS;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture11050429
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Although the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has been proved to be an efficient multiplex gene editing system in maize, it was still unclear how CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) system would perform for multiplex gene editing in maize. To this end, this study compared the CRISPR/Cpf1 system and CRISPR/Cas9 system for multiplex gene editing in maize. The bZIP transcription factor Opaque2 (O2) was used as the target gene in both systems. We found that in the T0 and T1 generations, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system showed lower editing efficiency than the CRISPR/Cas9 system. However, in the T2 generation, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system generated more types of new mutations. While the CRISPR/Cas9 system tended to edit within the on-target range, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system preferred to edit in between the targets. We also found that in the CRISPR/Cpf1 system, the editing efficiency positively correlated with the expression level of Cpf1. In conclusion, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system offers alternative choices for target-site selection for multiplex gene editing and has acceptable editing efficiency in maize and is a valuable alternative choice for gene editing in crops.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of CCR5 knockout using Cas9 and Cpf1 CRISPR nucleases
    Omelchenko, D. O.
    Glazkova, D. V.
    Bogoslovskaya, E. V.
    Shipulin, G. A.
    HUMAN GENE THERAPY, 2017, 28 (12) : A58 - A59
  • [32] Insights into maize genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9
    Astha Agarwal
    Pranjal Yadava
    Krishan Kumar
    Ishwar Singh
    Tanushri Kaul
    Arunava Pattanayak
    Pawan Kumar Agrawal
    Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2018, 24 : 175 - 183
  • [33] Two efficient CRISPR/Cas9 systems for gene editing in soybean
    Jéssica Carrijo
    Eudald Illa-Berenguer
    Peter LaFayette
    Nathalia Torres
    Francisco J. L. Aragão
    Wayne Parrott
    Giovanni R. Vianna
    Transgenic Research, 2021, 30 : 239 - 249
  • [34] Two efficient CRISPR/Cas9 systems for gene editing in soybean
    Carrijo, Jessica
    Illa-Berenguer, Eudald
    LaFayette, Peter
    Torres, Nathalia
    Aragao, Francisco J. L.
    Parrott, Wayne
    Vianna, Giovanni R.
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (03) : 239 - 249
  • [35] Activity and Specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 and Cas12a Systems in Plant Genome Editing.
    Qi, Yiping
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-ANIMAL, 2019, 55 : S4 - S4
  • [36] Gene Editing of the AAVS1 Locus with CRISPR/Cas9
    Vieira, Mathieu
    Bello, Ana Buj
    Le Roy, Florence G.
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2015, 23 : S53 - S53
  • [37] Development of a CRISPR/Cpf1 system for multiplex gene editing in Aspergillus oryzae
    Chen, Tianming
    Chen, Ziming
    Zhang, Huanxin
    Li, Yuzhen
    Yao, Lihua
    Zeng, Bin
    Zhang, Zhe
    FOLIA MICROBIOLOGICA, 2024, 69 (02) : 373 - 382
  • [38] The Cpf1 CRISPR-Cas protein expands genome-editing tools
    Robert D. Fagerlund
    Raymond H. J. Staals
    Peter C. Fineran
    Genome Biology, 16
  • [39] The Cpf1 CRISPR-Cas protein expands genome-editing tools
    Fagerlund, Robert D.
    Staals, Raymond H. J.
    Fineran, Peter C.
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2015, 16
  • [40] Efficient CRISPR–Cas9 mediated multiplex genome editing in yeasts
    Laiyou Wang
    Aihua Deng
    Yun Zhang
    Shuwen Liu
    Yong Liang
    Hua Bai
    Di Cui
    Qidi Qiu
    Xiuling Shang
    Zhao Yang
    Xiuping He
    Tingyi Wen
    Biotechnology for Biofuels, 11