Models of Voters and Politicians in a Digital Society under Uncertainty

被引:2
|
作者
Tsyganov, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Control Sci, Moscow 117997, Russia
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2019年 / 52卷 / 25期
关键词
Society; digital; control; uncertainty; decision making; activity; voter; politician; expert; TECHNOLOGIES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.495
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The paper considered 3 models of decision-making about voting for or against a politician in a digital society. These models correspond to different levels of voter awareness with random interference. In 1st model the decision making problem is solved for an experienced voter who knows the Bayesian characteristics of interference. In 2nd model a less experienced voter makes decisions using the recommendations of experts. To determine the optimal parameter of the decision rule, a stochastic approximation is proposed. In 3rd model asymmetric awareness of voter and politician about sociopolitical potential is considered. In this case, an unscrupulous politician may understate the socio-political indicator in order to maximize own goal function. That shifts an estimation of decision rule parameter. The voter is considered as apprentice using the recommendations of the mentor (i.e. expert not aware of that potential) for estimation and voting under uncertainty caused by both random interference and politician unwanted activity. Apprentice's estimation and voting procedures constitute the voting mechanism. The set of politician choices has been determined, at which the maximum of his goal function is achieved with this voting mechanism. Sufficient conditions are proved for the synthesis of the optimal voting mechanism, in which politician chooses the socio-political indicator equal to the potential. So the optimal parameter of the decision rule is determined. Obtained results are illustrated by the example of a union of regional states governed by politicians elected by local societies. (c) 2019, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 280
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Voters’ Distance, Information Bias and Politicians’ Salary
    David Bartolini
    Agnese Sacchi
    Domenico Scalera
    Alberto Zazzaro
    Italian Economic Journal, 2023, 9 : 637 - 664
  • [12] Do Voters Punish Women Politicians More?
    Sevi, Semra
    Crabtree, Charles
    Blais, Andre
    AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2024, 52 (06) : 701 - 708
  • [13] Voters' Distance, Information Bias and Politicians' Salary
    Bartolini, David
    Sacchi, Agnese
    Scalera, Domenico
    Zazzaro, Alberto
    ITALIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2023, 9 (02) : 637 - 664
  • [14] When Do Voters Sanction Corrupt Politicians?
    Klasnja, Marko
    Lupu, Noam
    Tucker, Joshua A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (02) : 161 - 171
  • [15] Mismatched Preferences for Responsiveness: Danish Voters and Politicians
    Pedersen, Helene Helboe
    SCANDINAVIAN POLITICAL STUDIES, 2021, 44 (02) : 148 - 169
  • [16] Voters' Partisan Responses to Politicians' Immoral Behavior
    Walter, Annemarie S.
    Redlawsk, David P.
    POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 40 (05) : 1075 - 1097
  • [17] Why do voters elect criminal politicians?
    Khemka, Abhinav
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2024, 82
  • [18] Personalities of politicians and voters: Unique and synergistic relationships
    Caprara, G
    Barbaranelli, C
    Consiglio, C
    Picconi, L
    Zimbardo, PG
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (04) : 849 - 856
  • [19] Are voters cursed when politicians conceal policy preferences?
    Szembrot, Nichole
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2017, 173 (1-2) : 25 - 41
  • [20] Voters elect politicians who closely matched their preferences
    Stadelmann, David
    Portmann, Marco
    Eichenberger, Reiner
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2013, 33 (02): : 1001 - 1009