Models of Voters and Politicians in a Digital Society under Uncertainty

被引:2
|
作者
Tsyganov, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Control Sci, Moscow 117997, Russia
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2019年 / 52卷 / 25期
关键词
Society; digital; control; uncertainty; decision making; activity; voter; politician; expert; TECHNOLOGIES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.495
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The paper considered 3 models of decision-making about voting for or against a politician in a digital society. These models correspond to different levels of voter awareness with random interference. In 1st model the decision making problem is solved for an experienced voter who knows the Bayesian characteristics of interference. In 2nd model a less experienced voter makes decisions using the recommendations of experts. To determine the optimal parameter of the decision rule, a stochastic approximation is proposed. In 3rd model asymmetric awareness of voter and politician about sociopolitical potential is considered. In this case, an unscrupulous politician may understate the socio-political indicator in order to maximize own goal function. That shifts an estimation of decision rule parameter. The voter is considered as apprentice using the recommendations of the mentor (i.e. expert not aware of that potential) for estimation and voting under uncertainty caused by both random interference and politician unwanted activity. Apprentice's estimation and voting procedures constitute the voting mechanism. The set of politician choices has been determined, at which the maximum of his goal function is achieved with this voting mechanism. Sufficient conditions are proved for the synthesis of the optimal voting mechanism, in which politician chooses the socio-political indicator equal to the potential. So the optimal parameter of the decision rule is determined. Obtained results are illustrated by the example of a union of regional states governed by politicians elected by local societies. (c) 2019, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 280
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Food for politicians, not for voters
    Bomhoff, EJ
    VAN DER Geest, L
    ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF ELECTION PROGRAMMES: DOES IT MAKE SENSE?, 2003, : 107 - 112
  • [2] LIBRARIANS, POLITICIANS, VOTERS
    BERRY, J
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1980, 105 (21) : 2449 - 2449
  • [3] POLITICIANS, IDEOLOGICAL MESSAGES, AND VOTERS
    NORTHOVER, M
    HARRIS, S
    DUFFY, M
    POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 15 (04) : 713 - 730
  • [4] STRATEGIC POLITICIANS AND UNRESPONSIVE VOTERS
    BORN, R
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1986, 80 (02) : 599 - 612
  • [5] Sensitivity to Injustice of Politicians and Voters
    Reinhaus, David
    Jelich, Holger
    Tschuschke, Volker
    Wolgast, Anett
    SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 52 (06) : 321 - 330
  • [6] POLITICIANS BELIEFS ABOUT VOTERS
    KINGDON, JW
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1967, 61 (01) : 137 - 145
  • [7] Uninformed Voters and Corrupt Politicians
    Klasnja, Marko
    AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (02) : 256 - 279
  • [8] Voters Punish Politicians with Depression
    Loewen, Peter John
    Rheault, Ludovic
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 51 (01) : 427 - 436
  • [9] Representative Democracy in Japan: Voters and Politicians
    Reed, Steven R.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE JAPAN JOURNAL, 2022, 25 (02) : 385 - 386
  • [10] Populist voters like dark politicians
    Nai, Alessandro
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2022, 187