Venous thromboembolism risk assessment of surgical patients in Southwest China using real-world data: establishment and evaluation of an improved venous thromboembolism risk model

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Peng [1 ,5 ]
Wang, Yao [2 ]
Yuan, Zhaoying [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Fei [5 ]
Wang, Hongqian [5 ]
Li, Ying [5 ]
Wang, Chengliang [1 ]
Li, Linfeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Yidu Cloud Technol Inc, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Renmin Univ China, Ctr Appl Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Renmin Univ China, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Southwest Hosp, Med Big Data Ctr, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Venous thromboembolism; Risk assessment model; Caprini; Surgical patients; Machine learning; CLINICAL PRESENTATION; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; MAJOR SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; THROMBOSIS; CANCER; VALIDATION; CRITERION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-022-01795-9
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in surgical patients is important for the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of patients. The commonly used Caprini model is limited by its inadequate ability to discriminate between risk stratums on the surgical population in southwest China and lengthy risk factors. The purpose of this study was to establish an improved VTE risk assessment model that is accurate and simple. Methods This study is based on the clinical data from 81,505 surgical patients hospitalized in the Southwest Hospital of China between January 1, 2019 and June 18, 2021. Among the population, 559 patients developed VTE. An improved VTE risk assessment model, SW-model, was established through Logistic Regression, with comparisons to both Caprini and Random Forest. Results The SW-model incorporated eight risk factors. The area under the curve (AUC) of SW-model (0.807 [0.758, 0.853], 0.804 [0.765, 0.840]), are significantly superior (p = 0.001 and p = 0.044) to those of the Caprini (0.705 [0.652, 0.757], 0.758 [0.719, 0795]) on two test sets, but inferior (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002) to Random Forest (0.854 [0.814, 0.890], 0.839 [0.806, 0.868]). In decision curve analysis, within threshold range from 0.015 to 0.04, the DCA curves of the SW-model are superior to Caprini and two default strategies. Conclusions The SW-model demonstrated a higher discriminative capability to distinguish VTE positive in surgical patients compared with the Caprini model. Compared to Random Forest, Logistic Regression based SW-model provided interpretability which is essential in guarantee the procedure of risk assessment transparent to clinicians.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improved venous thromboembolism risk assessment with a multilocus genetic risk score
    Gerotziafas, G. T.
    Onambele, M.
    Ketatni, H.
    Planche, V
    Delassasseigne, C.
    Elalamy, I
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2016, 14 : 72 - 72
  • [32] Venous thromboembolism risk stratification in trauma using the Caprini risk assessment model
    Hazeltine, Max D.
    Guber, Robert D.
    Buettner, Hannah
    Dorfman, Jon D.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2021, 208 : 52 - 57
  • [33] Risk assessment of venous thromboembolism in head and neck cancer patients and its establishment of a prediction model
    Li, Chen-xi
    He, Qi
    Wang, Zheng-ye
    Fang, Chang
    Gong, Zhong-cheng
    Zhao, Hua-rong
    Ling, Bin
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2023, 45 (10): : 2515 - 2524
  • [34] Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Hospitalized Tofacitinib-Exposed Patients: A Real-World Experience of 533 Patients
    Obi, Megan
    Aykun, Nihal
    Pineiro, Ana Otero
    McMichael, John
    Bena, James
    Xiao, Huijun
    Holubar, Stefan
    Lipman, Jeremy
    Steele, Scott
    Hull, Tracy
    Lightner, Amy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 : S24 - S24
  • [35] Risk assessment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients
    Spyropoulos, Alex C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2010, 16 (05) : 419 - 425
  • [36] Venous Thromboembolism (VIE): Risk Assessment in Hospitalized Patients
    Soomro, Quratulain
    Yousuf, Nailla
    Bhutto, Afsar Ali
    Abro, Hakim Ali
    Memon, Aijaz Ahmed
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2014, 24 (07): : 455 - 458
  • [37] VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM PROPHYLAXIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT IN MEDICAL PATIENTS
    ARCELUS, JI
    CANDOCIA, S
    TRAVERSO, CI
    FABREGA, F
    CAPRINI, JA
    HASTY, JH
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1991, 17 : 313 - 318
  • [38] Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma
    Naim, Sara
    Douma, Soukaina
    Benmoussa, Amine
    Berrada, Sophia
    Lamchahab, Mouna
    Cherkaoui, Siham
    Qachouh, Meryem
    Rachid, Mohamed
    Madani, Abdellah
    Khoubila, Nisrine
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2024, 24 : S449 - S450
  • [39] Venous thromboembolism risk assessment in medical patients.
    Cohen, AT
    Alikhan, R
    Arcelus, J
    Haas, S
    Spyropoulos, A
    Tapson, V
    Turpie, AGG
    BLOOD, 2002, 100 (11) : 280A - 280A
  • [40] A venous thromboembolism risk assessment model for patients with Cushing’s syndrome
    Marialuisa Zilio
    Linda Mazzai
    Maria Teresa Sartori
    Mattia Barbot
    Filippo Ceccato
    Viviana Daidone
    Alessandra Casonato
    Graziella Saggiorato
    Franco Noventa
    Laura Trementino
    Paolo Prandoni
    Marco Boscaro
    Giorgio Arnaldi
    Carla Scaroni
    Endocrine, 2016, 52 : 322 - 332