Diverticular per oral endoscopic myotomy (DPOEM) for esophageal diverticular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Mandavdhare, Harshal S. [1 ]
Praveen Kumar, M. [2 ]
Jha, Dayakrishna [1 ]
Kumar, Antriksh [1 ]
Sharma, Vishal [1 ]
Desai, Pankaj [3 ]
Shumkina, Lada [4 ]
Gupta, Pankaj [5 ]
Singh, Harjeet [6 ]
Dutta, Usha [1 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Gastroenterol, Chandigarh 160012, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Pharmacol, Chandigarh, India
[3] Surat Inst Digest Sci, Surat, India
[4] Moscow Clin Sci Ctr, Endoscopy Dept, Moscow, Russia
[5] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Radiodiag, Chandigarh, India
[6] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Surg, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Diverticulum; Esophagus; FESD; D-POEM; Success; SUBMUCOSAL TUNNELING TECHNIQUE; ZENKERS DIVERTICULUM; SEPTUM DIVISION; Z-POEM; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10388-021-00839-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The traditional way to tackle Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) has been flexible endoscopic septum division (FESD). Recently, the concept of per oral endoscopic myotomy has been found useful for managing diverticular diseases of the esophagus and has been termed DPOEM. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-POEM in diverticular disease of the esophagus and to compare it with FESD. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase, for studies reporting clinical success, technical success and adverse events in D-POEM alone or D-POEM comparing with FESD. We computed pooled prevalence for D-POEM alone and risk ratio for D-POEM vs FESD using random effect method with inverse variance approach. Subgroup analysis for ZD, non-ZD and mixed diverticulum was conducted. Totally 19 studies including 341 patients were identified reporting on D-POEM. The pooled clinical, technical success and adverse event rates for D-POEM were 87.07%, 95.19% and 10.22%, respectively. The clinical success was significantly better than FESD while the technical success, adverse event rate, procedure time and length of hospital stay were comparable with FESD. The recurrence rate was negligible for D-POEM compared to FESD. On subgroup analysis by dividing into three groups of ZD, non-ZD and mixed, there was no difference between clinical, technical success and adverse event rate among the three groups. D-POEM is an effective and safe technique among both ZD and non-ZD patients and has better clinical success than FESD.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 450
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effectiveness of Endoscopic Treatments for Colonic Diverticular Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ishii, Naoki
    Omata, Fumio
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB124 - AB125
  • [12] SHORT VERSUS LONG ESOPHAGEAL MYOTOMY DURING PER-ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM): A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE TRIALS
    Nabi, Zaheer
    Talukdar, Rupjyoti
    Mandavdhare, Harshal
    Reddy, D. Nageshwar
    GUT, 2021, 70 : A106 - A107
  • [13] POST-PER-ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM) GERD: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Srinivasan, Sachin
    Radadiya, Dhruvil
    Patel, Harsh
    Perisetti, Abhilash
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Desai, Madhav
    Repici, Alessandro
    Hassan, Cesare
    Duvvur, Nageshwar
    Sharma, Prateek
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB1055 - AB1055
  • [14] ENDOSCOPIC BAND LIGATION VERSUS CLIPPING FOR DIVERTICULAR BLEEDING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS
    De Bellis, M.
    Lacavalla, I
    Iannone, A.
    Losurdo, G.
    Di Leo, A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2023, 55 : S143 - S143
  • [15] Efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Puri, Rajesh
    Giri, Suprabhat
    Panigrahi, Sarat Chandra
    Mallick, Bipadabhanjan
    Nath, Preetam
    Sharma, Zubin Dev
    Sahu, Bimal Kumar
    ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 21 (04) : 419 - 429
  • [16] LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF PER ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC HELLER MYOTOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Eltelbany, Ahmed
    Mohammed, Abdul
    Trakroo, Sushrut
    Khoudari, George
    Hamid, Osama
    Thota, Prashanthi N.
    Raja, Siva
    Sanaka, Madhusudhan R.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) : AB300 - AB301
  • [17] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PER-ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM) AFTER FAILED HELLER MYOTOMY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Kamal, Faisal
    Khan, Muhammad Ali
    Khan, Zubair
    Shrestha, Shreesh
    Talat, Arslan
    Khan, Salman
    Ahmad, Dina
    Howden, Colin W.
    Tombazzi, Claudio
    Ismail, Mohammad K.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB148 - AB149
  • [18] GERD after per-oral endoscopic myotomy as compared with Heller's myotomy with fundoplication: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Repici, Alessandro
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Maselli, Roberta
    Mazza, Fabrizio
    Correale, Loredana
    Mandolesi, Daniele
    Bellisario, Cristina
    Sethi, Amrita
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    Roesch, Thomas
    Hassan, Cesare
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (04) : 934 - +
  • [19] Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Treatment of Esophageal Diverticula A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Ramai, Daryl
    Ichkhanian, Yervant
    Yadlapati, Rena
    Annese, Vito
    Wani, Sachin
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 56 (10) : 853 - 862
  • [20] Learning curve for esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Puli, Srinivas R. R.
    Wagh, Mihir S. S.
    Forcione, David
    Gopakumar, Harishankar
    ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 (04) : 355 - 360