Reinforcing the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Prospective Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Three Different Techniques

被引:154
|
作者
Dapri, Giovanni [1 ]
Cadiere, Guy Bernard [1 ]
Himpens, Jacques [1 ]
机构
[1] St Pierre Univ Hosp, European Sch Laparoscop Surg, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Sleeve gastrectomy; No staple line reinforcement; Buttressing staple line; Staple line suturing; Leak; Bleeding; Y GASTRIC BYPASS; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; BARIATRIC SURGERY; DUODENAL SWITCH; MORBID-OBESITY; LEAKS; PRESSURE; FISTULAS; REDUCE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-009-0047-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Gastric leak and hemorrhage are the most important challenges after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). In order to reduce these complications, the staple line can be reinforced by absorbable sutures or by the use of glycolide trimethylene carbonate copolymer onto the linear stapler (Gore SeamguardA (R); W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ). To our knowledge, there are no randomized studies showing the utility of staple line reinforcement during LSG. The purpose of this study was to randomly compare three techniques in LSG: no staple line reinforcement (group 1), buttressing of the staple line with Gore SeamguardA (R) (group 2), and staple line suturing (group 3). Between January 2008 and February 2009, 75 patients were prospectively and randomly enrolled in the three different techniques of handling the staple line during LSG. The patient groups were similar (NS). Mean operative time to perform the stomach sectioning was 15.9 +/- 5.9 min (group 1), 20.8 +/- 8.1 min (group 2), and 30.8 +/- 10.1 min (group 3) (p < 0.001). Mean total operative time was 47.4 +/- 10.7 min (group 1), 48.9 +/- 18.4 min (group 2), and 59.9 +/- 19.6 min (group 3) (p = 0.02). Mean blood loss during stomach sectioning was 19.5 +/- 21.3 mL (group 1), 3.6 +/- 4.7 mL (group 2), and 16.7 +/- 23.5 mL (group 3) (p < 0.001). Mean total blood loss was 48.9 +/- 67.1 mL (group 1), 32.5 +/- 46.5 mL (group 2), and 61.9 +/- 69.4 mL (group 3) (p = 0.03). Mean number of stapler cartridges used was 5.6 +/- 0.7 (group 1), 5.7 +/- 0.7 (group 2), and 5.8 +/- 0.6 (group 3) (NS). Postoperative leak affected one patient (group 1), two patients (group 2), and one patient (group 3) (NS). Mean hospital stay was 3.6 +/- 1.4 days (group 1), 3.9 +/- 1.5 days (group 2), and 2.8 +/- 0.8 days (group 3) (p = 0.01). In LSG, buttressing the staple line with Gore SeamguardA (R) statistically reduces blood loss during stomach sectioning as well as overall blood loss. No staple line reinforcement statistically decreases the time to perform stomach sectioning and the total operative time. No significant difference is evidenced in terms of postoperative leak between the three techniques of LSG.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 467
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of the calibration bougie diametre during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on the rate of postoperative staple-line leak (BOUST): study protocol for a multicentre randomized prospective trial
    Martin Gaillard
    Panagiotis Lainas
    Hélène Agostini
    Ibrahim Dagher
    Hadrien Tranchart
    Trials, 22
  • [42] Impact of the calibration bougie diametre during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on the rate of postoperative staple-line leak (BOUST): study protocol for a multicentre randomized prospective trial
    Gaillard, Martin
    Lainas, Panagiotis
    Agostini, Helene
    Dagher, Ibrahim
    Tranchart, Hadrien
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [43] Prospective Randomized Comparison of Linear Endostaplers During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Raftopoulos, Yannis
    Rajkumar, Shruthi
    Davidson, Elana
    Papasavas, Pavlos
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (10) : 3472 - 3480
  • [44] Prospective Randomized Comparison of Linear Endostaplers During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Yannis Raftopoulos
    Shruthi Rajkumar
    Elana Davidson
    Pavlos Papasavas
    Obesity Surgery, 2022, 32 : 3472 - 3480
  • [45] Does Staple-Line Reinforcement Reduce the Rate of Leaks after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy- a Prospective Study
    Mahajna, A.
    Bishara, B.
    Krausz, M. M.
    Kluger, Y.
    Assalia, A.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2011, 21 (08) : 1111 - 1111
  • [46] Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with staple line reinforcement with oversewing and staple line inversion vs buttressing material: A randomized clinical trial
    Ruiz-Tovar, Jaime
    Zubiaga, Lorea
    Luis Munoz, Jose
    Llavero, Carolina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 59 : 75 - 79
  • [47] Erratum to: Buttressing the Staple Line: A Randomized Comparison Between Staple-Line Reinforcement Versus No Reinforcement During Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Shashank S. Shah
    Jayashree S. Todkar
    Poonam S. Shah
    Obesity Surgery, 2015, 25 : 392 - 392
  • [48] Comparison of four different methods in staple line reinforcement during laparascopic sleeve gastrectomy
    Bulbuller, Nurullah
    Aslaner, Arif
    Oner, Osman Zekai
    Oruc, Mehmet Tahir
    Koc, Umit
    Ongen, Nuray Ayper
    Eryilmaz, Ramazan
    Cantilav, Guvenc
    Habibi, Mani
    Ozdemir, Sukru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2013, 6 (10): : 985 - 990
  • [49] Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Gagner, Michel
    Zappa, Marco Antonio
    Lastraioli, Caterina
    Lombardo, Francesca
    Panizzo, Valerio
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Cavalli, Marta
    Campanelli, Giampiero
    Bona, Davide
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (05) : 1466 - 1478
  • [50] Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Alberto Aiolfi
    Michel Gagner
    Marco Antonio Zappa
    Caterina Lastraioli
    Francesca Lombardo
    Valerio Panizzo
    Gianluca Bonitta
    Marta Cavalli
    Giampiero Campanelli
    Davide Bona
    Obesity Surgery, 2022, 32 : 1466 - 1478