Prior knowledge, industry 4.0 and digital servitization. An inductive framework

被引:52
|
作者
Paiola, Marco [1 ]
Schiavone, Francesco [2 ,3 ]
Khvatova, Tatiana [4 ]
Grandinetti, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Econ & Management, Via Santo 22, I-35123 Padua, Italy
[2] Parthenope Univ Naples, Dept Management Studies & Quantitat Methods, Via Generale Parisi 12, I-80132 Naples, Italy
[3] Emlyon Business Sch, 23 Ave Guy de Collongue, F-69130 Ecully, France
[4] Emlyon Business Sch, Entrepreneurship & Innovat Res Ctr, 23 Ave Guy de Collongue, F-69130 Ecully, France
关键词
Digital Servitization; Industry; 4; 0; Prior Knowledge; Disruptive Technologies; Italy; BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; SERVICE INNOVATION; PRODUCT INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; THINGS; EXAPTATION; ADOPTION; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120963
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Over the last few years digital servitization has become a very popular topic in the industrial marketing and technology management literature. The present article contributes to the extant literature on business models for digital servitization by investigating the roles and effects of prior technological knowledge. To date, this rich and growing body of literature has underestimated a crucial corporate asset for value creation, and that is firms' past experience and knowledge. Such a corporate heritage may have relevant implications for a firm's approach and decisions regarding digital servitization, however, especially if it is related to one (or more) of the I4.0 technologies. The research question posed in the present article is thus: how does a company's prior knowledge affect its digital servitization strategies? To answer this question, we conducted a multiple case study, collecting and analyzing primary and secondary data about Italian medium- to large-sized enterprises that had recently implemented digital servitization. The findings illustrate the different effects of the technological solutions adopted on the companies' business models, and delineate an inductive matrix with four different ideal-typical business models: expert industrializer; explorative solutioner; explorative industrializer; and expert solutioner.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What is knowledge in Industry 4.0?
    Ullah, A. M. M. Sharif
    ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2020, 2 (08)
  • [22] Digital Twins in Industry 4.0
    Park, Sangchan
    Maliphol, Sira
    Woo, Jiyoung
    Fan, Liu
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (12)
  • [23] The Digital Thread in Industry 4.0
    Margaria, Tiziana
    Schieweck, Alexander
    INTEGRATED FORMAL METHODS, IFM 2019, 2019, 11918 : 3 - 24
  • [24] Industry 4.0 and Digital Twins
    Speicher, Terrance F.
    DeFranco, Joanna F.
    COMPUTER, 2023, 56 (06) : 84 - 88
  • [25] DIGITAL ECONOMY AND INDUSTRY 4.0
    Doucek, Petr
    Holoska, Jiri
    INNOVATION AND TRANSFORMATION IN A DIGITAL WORLD (IDIMT-2019), 2019, 48 : 33 - 39
  • [26] Digital transition from industry 4.0 to industry 5.0 in smart manufacturing: A framework for sustainable future
    Sarkar, Bishal Dey
    Shardeo, Vipulesh
    Dwivedi, Ashish
    Pamucar, Dragan
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2024, 78
  • [27] Towards a knowledge structuring framework for decision making within industry 4.0 paradigm
    Meski, O.
    Belkadi, F.
    Furet, B.
    Laroche, F.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (13): : 677 - 682
  • [28] A framework for assessing social acceptability of industry 4.0 technologies for the development of digital manufacturing
    Kumar, Anil
    Agrawal, Rohit
    Wankhede, Vishal A.
    Sharma, Manu
    Mulat-weldemeskel, Eyob
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 174
  • [29] Validation of Complex Control Systems with Heterogeneous Digital Models in Industry 4.0 Framework
    Semenkov, Kirill
    Promyslov, Vitaly
    Poletykin, Alexey
    Mengazetdinov, Nadir
    MACHINES, 2021, 9 (03)
  • [30] The role of digital knowledge servitization in supply chain management
    Pizzichini, Lucia
    Temperini, Valerio
    Caboni, Federica
    Papa, Armando
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 53 (5/6) : 589 - 611