Experimental and kinetic study on anaerobic co-digestion of poultry manure and food waste

被引:10
|
作者
Deepanraj, B. [1 ]
Sivasubramanian, V. [2 ]
Jayaraj, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Calicut, Dept Mech Engn, Calicut 673601, Kerala, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol Calicut, Dept Chem Engn, Calicut 673601, Kerala, India
关键词
Biogas; Co-digestion; Anaerobic digestion; Food waste; Poultry manure; BIOGAS PRODUCTION BATCH; SWINE MANURE; REACTOR; SILAGE;
D O I
10.5004/dwt.2016.0162
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Enhancement of biogas production by adding external substrates as a co-digestion material is one of the solution to increase energy self-sufficiency of the anaerobic digestion process. The aim of this work is to analyze the impact of anaerobic co-digestion of poultry manure with food waste on the biogas production. Experiments were conducted on a range of 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40% of poultry manure with 100, 90, 80, 70 and 60% of food waste (CD0, CD10, CD20, CD30 and CD40) respectively. Five laboratory scale batch reactors of capacity 2 L were used for this work. The solid concentration, pH and temperature values taken in all the reactors were 7.5% of total solids, 7 pH and 50 degrees C respectively. It was observed that the highest cumulative biogas yield of 8469 mL and methane concentration of 62.03% were obtained with the co-digested substrate CD30 (30% of poultry manure with 70% of food waste), whereas 7556 mL was obtained with raw food waste (CD0). The degradation efficiencies (TS, VS and COD) were also higher for CD30 compared to the other four substrates. First order kinetic model, modified Gompertz model and Logistic model were evaluated for the biogas yield and the predicted results were compared with the experimental results.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 76
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle rumen content and food waste for biogas production: Establishment of co-digestion ratios and kinetic studies
    Ihoeghian, Newton A.
    Amenaghawon, Andrew N.
    Ajieh, Mike U.
    Oshoma, Cyprian E.
    Ogofure, Abraham
    Erhunmwunse, Nosakhare O.
    Edosa, Valerie I. O.
    Tongo, Isioma
    Obuekwe, Ifeyinwa S.
    Isagba, Ebuwa S.
    Emokaro, Christopher
    Ezemonye, Lawrence I. N.
    Lag-Brotons, Alfonso J.
    Semple, Kirk T.
    Martin, Alastair D.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 18
  • [22] Batch Anaerobic Co-Digestion and Biochemical Methane Potential Analysis of Goat Manure and Food Waste
    Orangun, Ayobami
    Kaur, Harjinder
    Kommalapati, Raghava R.
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (07)
  • [23] Anaerobic co-digestion of grass and cow manure: kinetic and GHG calculations
    Ayse Hilal Ulukardesler
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [24] Anaerobic co-digestion of grass and cow manure: kinetic and GHG calculations
    Ulukardesler, Ayse Hilal
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [25] Recent advances in co-digestion conjugates for anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Shrestha, Sujesh
    Pandey, Rajeev
    Aryal, Nabin
    Lohani, Sunil Prasad
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 345
  • [26] Co-digestion of food waste and dairy manure for biogas production
    El-Mashad, H. M.
    Zhang, R.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2007, 50 (05) : 1815 - 1822
  • [27] MODELING OF ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION USING ORGANIC WASTE AND MANURE AS SUBSTRATE
    Pannucharoenwong, Nattadon
    Rattanadecho, Phadungsak
    Echaroj, Snunkhaem
    SURANAREE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 27 (03):
  • [28] Anaerobic Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste and Cattle Manure for Methane Production
    Li, R.
    Chen, S.
    Li, X.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2009, 31 (20) : 1848 - 1856
  • [29] MODELING OF ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION OF PIG MANURE AND DOMESTIC ORGANIC WASTE
    Thongnan, Rachadaporn
    Thongpan, Hathaikarn
    Rakmak, Nirattisai
    Siripatana, Chairat
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2016, 78 (5-6): : 117 - 124
  • [30] Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Influence of co-digestion with manure
    Hartmann, H
    Ahring, BK
    WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (08) : 1543 - 1552