What Are the Barriers to Residents' Practicing Evidence-Based Medicine? A Systematic Review

被引:108
|
作者
van Dijk, Nynke [1 ]
Hooft, Lotty [2 ]
Wieringa-de Waard, Margreet [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice Family Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dutch Cochrane Ctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL QUESTIONS; PHYSICIANS; CARE; CURRICULUM; ATTITUDE; ANSWER; FAIL; EBM;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d4152f
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose Insufficient time and lack of skills are important barriers to the practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Residents could have additional barriers because their practice can be strongly influenced by the educational system and clinical supervisors. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to systematically appraise and summarize the literature on the barriers that residents experience in the application of EBM in daily practice. Method The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ERIC for publications preceding January 2008. Additionally, they manually screened the abstracts of relevant conferences (Association for Medical Education in Europe, Society of General Internal Medicine, Society of Medical Decision Making, Ottawa, and Evidence-Based Health Care Teachers & Developers) from January 2001 until January 2008. The search was extended by contacting experts in the field. Original studies on barriers to applying EBM in daily practice were included. Methodological quality was assessed and results were extracted by two reviewers using prespecified forms. Results The search resulted in 511 titles, 84 abstracts, and 3 studies suggested by experts, of which 9 were included in this review. The quality of the included studies was high. The most frequently mentioned barriers for residents were limited available time (28%-85%), attitude, and knowledge and skills. In four studies, specific barriers related to the position of residents, such as influences from staff members, lack of experience in EBM, and low possibilities to change conditions, were described. Conclusions Residents experience specific barriers to practice EBM. These barriers should be recognized and integrated into EBM training programs for residents.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1170
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What is evidence-based medicine?
    Antes, G
    Galandi, D
    Bouillon, B
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 384 (05) : 409 - 416
  • [22] What is evidence-based medicine?
    Montori, VM
    Guyatt, GH
    ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 31 (03) : 521 - +
  • [23] Evidence-Based Medicine?!... What for?
    Pelaez-Luna, M.
    REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO, 2012, 77 (04): : 157 - 158
  • [24] Proponents gather to discuss practicing evidence-based medicine
    Marwick, C
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (07): : 531 - 532
  • [25] BEYOND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE: THE LIMITS OF EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, AND WHAT TO DO
    Tonelli, Mark R.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2011, : 115 - 115
  • [26] Evidence-based medicine curricula and barriers for physicians in training: a scoping review
    Halalau, Alexandra
    Holmes, Brett
    Rogers-Snyr, Andrea
    Donisan, Teodora
    Nielsen, Eric
    Cerqueira, Tiago L.
    Guyatt, Gordon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 12 : 101 - 124
  • [27] Using the Methodology of Systematic Review of Reviews for Evidence-Based Medicine
    Hasanpoor, Edris
    Hallajzadeh, Jamal
    Siraneh, Yibeltal
    Hasanzadeh, Ebrahim
    Haghgoshayie, Elaheh
    ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2019, 29 (06) : 775 - 778
  • [28] WHAT'S THE EVIDENCE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE?
    Body, Rick
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2008, 25 (12) : 841 - 842
  • [29] Evidence-Based Medicine: What's the Evidence?
    Baum, Seth J.
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (05) : 259 - 260
  • [30] Mechanisms: what are they evidence for in evidence-based medicine?
    Andersen, Holly
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (05) : 992 - 999