Comparison of Two Common Approaches to Public Transist Service Equity Evaluation

被引:22
|
作者
Karner, Alex [1 ]
Golub, Aaron [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Julie Ann Wrigley Global Inst Sustainabil, 1151 South Forest Ave, Tempe, AZ 85218 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85218 USA
关键词
EMPLOYMENT ACCESSIBILITY; TRAVEL;
D O I
10.3141/2531-20
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Understanding the equity effects of transit service changes requires good information about the demographics of transit ridership. Onboard survey data and census data can be used to estimate equity effects, although there is no clear reason to conclude that these two sources will lead to the same findings. Guidance from the FTA recommends the use of either of these data sources to estimate equity impacts. This study made a direct comparison of the two methods for the public transit system in the Phoenix, Arizona, metropolitan area. The results indicated that although both sources were acceptable for FTA compliance, the use of one or the other could affect whether a proposed service change was deemed equitable. In other words, the outcome of a service change equity analysis could differ as a result of the data source used. To ensure the integrity and meaning of such analyses, FTA should recommend the collection and use of ridership data for conducting service change analyses to supplement approaches that are based on census data.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 179
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accessibility, Equity, and Efficiency: Challenges for Transport and Public Service
    Song, Ying
    JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (01) : 193 - 194
  • [22] Designing energy solutions: a comparison of two participatory design approaches for service innovation
    Willmott, Taylor Jade
    Hurley, Erin
    Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn
    JOURNAL OF SERVICE THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (03) : 353 - 377
  • [23] Vertical equity in service provision: a model for the Irish public health nursing service
    Hanafin, S
    Houston, AM
    Cowley, S
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2002, 39 (01) : 68 - 76
  • [24] Social Equity, Diversity, and Identity: Challenges for Public Affairs Education and the Public Service
    Rivera, Mario A.
    Ward, James D.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION, 2008, 14 (01) : II - VIII
  • [25] A Comparison of Common Model Updating Approaches
    Xu, D.
    Mahdiabadi, M. Karamooz
    Bartl, A.
    Rixen, D. J.
    DYNAMICS OF COUPLED STRUCTURES, VOL 4, 34TH IMAC, 2016, : 439 - 446
  • [26] APPROACHES TO DEFINING, MEASURING, AND ACHIEVING EQUITY IN PUBLIC-SECTOR
    CAMPBELL, AK
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1976, 36 (05) : 556 - 562
  • [27] AN EVALUATION OF PUBLIC BUS PROVISION FOR SOCIAL EQUITY
    Soltani, A.
    Ivaki, Y. Esmaeili
    TRANSPORT DYNAMICS, 2011, : 681 - 688
  • [28] Evaluation and comparison of two approaches to capture the electrical behaviour of battery cells
    Ziese, Johann
    Franke, Marcel
    Kowal, Julia
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 30
  • [29] Comparison and evaluation of two approaches of a multilayered QA system applied to temporality
    Saquete, E
    Muñoz, R
    Martínez-Barco, P
    Vicedo, JL
    ADVANCES IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2004, 3230 : 91 - 102
  • [30] Evaluation of regional key comparison data: two approaches for data processing
    Kharitonov, I. A.
    Chunovkina, A. G.
    METROLOGIA, 2006, 43 (05) : 470 - 476