The effect of shareholder-debtholder conflicts on corporate tax aggressiveness: Evidence from dual holders

被引:8
|
作者
Francis, Bill [1 ]
Teng, Haimeng [2 ]
Wang, Ying [3 ]
Wu, Qiang [4 ]
机构
[1] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Lally Sch Management, Troy, NY USA
[2] Sch Business Adm, Penn State Harrisburg, Middletown, PA 17057 USA
[3] State Univ New York Albany, Ctr Inst Investment Management, Massry Ctr Business 365, Sch Business, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Accounting & Finance, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Tax aggressiveness; Shareholder-debtholder conflicts; Dual holders; Risk shifting; Managerial risk-taking incentives; AVOIDANCE EVIDENCE; EQUITY; DEBT; FIRM; INCENTIVES; OWNERSHIP; RETURNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106411
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate the effect of agency conflicts between shareholders and debtholders on aggressive tax avoidance using a unique setting of dual holders who simultaneously hold equity and debt of the same firms. We find robust evidence that firms with dual holders exhibit more aggressive tax behavior even after controlling for endogeneity, suggesting that shareholder-debtholder conflicts induce firms to under invest in tax aggressiveness. In addition, there exists a concave relation between tax aggressiveness and dual owners' debt exposure relative to their overall debt and equity exposures to the investee firms. Further tests show that the effect of dual ownership on tax aggressiveness is more pronounced among firms with higher risk-shifting tendencies and higher managerial risk-taking incentives. Finally, our bond borrowing cost test shows that dual holdings mitigate the increased cost of borrowing due to aggressive tax avoidance.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of shareholder scrutiny on corporate tax behavior: Evidence from shareholder tax litigation
    Donelson, Dain C.
    Glenn, Jennifer L.
    Mcguire, Sean T.
    Yust, Christopher G.
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2024, 41 (01) : 163 - 194
  • [2] The effect of tax preparers on corporate tax aggressiveness: Evidence form theUKcontext
    Assidi, Soufiene
    Hussainey, Khaled
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2021, 26 (02) : 2279 - 2288
  • [3] The effect of shareholder pressure on stakeholder interests: Evidence from corporate tax avoidance
    Jiang, Jiaoliang
    Bao, Hengmiao
    Yang, Shijie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [4] Corporate Reporting, Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence from Indonesia
    Kesumaningrum, Ninuk Dewi
    Bujang, Imbarine
    Muda, Ruhaini
    Mohamed, Norhayati
    ASIA-PACIFIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING JOURNAL, 2023, 18 (02): : 29 - 56
  • [5] Debtholder Responses to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from Hedge Fund Interventions
    Sunder, Jayanthi
    Sunder, Shyam V.
    Wongsunwai, Wan
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2014, 27 (11): : 3318 - 3342
  • [6] Impact of executive compensation on corporate tax aggressiveness: evidence from India
    Gill, Suveera
    Arora, Taruntej Singh
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2022, 48 (06) : 833 - 852
  • [7] Corporate tax aggressiveness and capital structure decisions: Evidence from China
    Jin, Xiaoye
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 75 : 94 - 111
  • [8] Government ownership, corporate governance and tax aggressiveness: evidence from China
    Chan, K. Hung
    Mo, Phyllis L. L.
    Zhou, Amy Y.
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2013, 53 (04): : 1029 - 1051
  • [9] Impact of corporate tax aggressiveness on firm value: evidence from India
    Arora, Taruntej Singh
    Gill, Suveera
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2022, 48 (02) : 313 - 333
  • [10] Discussion of 'Government ownership, corporate governance and tax aggressiveness: evidence from China'
    Chen, Chen
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2013, 53 (04): : 1053 - 1059