Using Multiple Ecological Models to Inform Environmental Decision-Making

被引:18
|
作者
Lewis, Kristy A. [1 ]
Rose, Kenneth A. [2 ]
de Mutsert, Kim [3 ]
Sable, Shaye [4 ]
Ainsworth, Cameron [5 ]
Brady, Damian C. [6 ]
Townsend, Howard [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Biol, Natl Ctr Integrated Coastal Res, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Horn Point Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Cambridge, MD USA
[3] Univ Southern Mississippi, Sch Ocean Sci & Engn, Div Coastal Sci, Ocean Springs, MS USA
[4] Dynam Solut LLC, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[5] Univ S Florida, Coll Marine Sci, St Petersburg, FL USA
[6] Univ Maine, Darling Marine Ctr, Walpole, ME 04573 USA
[7] Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Off Sci & Technol, Marine Ecosyst Div, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
food web; ensemble model; restoration; ecosystem model; management decisions;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2021.625790
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coastal ecosystems are experiencing degradation from compound impacts of climate change and multiple anthropogenic disturbances. These pressures often act synergistically and complicate designing effective conservation measures; consequently, large-scale coastal restoration actions become a wicked problem. The purpose of this study was to use two different food web models in a coordinated manner to inform resource managers in their assessment of the ecological effects of a large-scale marsh restoration project. A team was formed that included the model developers and outside scientists, who were asked to use available model results of the calibrated simulations of an Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) model and a Comprehensive Aquatic Systems Model (CASM), both designed to describe the structure and energetics of the Barataria Bay, Louisiana, United States food web. Both models offer somewhat different depictions of the predator-prey and competitive interactions of species within the food web, and how environmental conditions affect the species biomass pools and energetics. Collectively, the team evaluated the strengths of each model and derived a common set of indicator variables from model outputs that provided information on the structure and energy flow of the simulated food web. Considering the different modeling structures and calibration approaches, indicators were interpreted within and between models. Use of both models enabled a robust determination that: (1) Detritus plays a vital role in the energetics of the system; (2) The food web responds to spring high flow seasons by increasing productivity through specific, dominant pathways; (3) The trophic pyramid is truncated; (4) Compared to other estuaries, this system has redundant pathways for energy transfer. These findings indicate that the food web appears to be resilient to disturbance because of a detritus energy reserve, most consumer biomass consists of low trophic level, high turnover species, and redundant energy pathways exist. This information provides context to decision-makers for assessing possible basin-scale impacts on fish and shellfish resources of a proposed large-scale restoration project. The use of multiple models in a coordinated but not overly constrained way, as demonstrated here, provides a significant step toward co-production of knowledge for use in resource management decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental decision-making using GIS and LCA
    Syrrakou, H
    Yianoulis, P
    Skordilis, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIOANL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL C, POSTERS, 2001, : 500 - 508
  • [22] Decision making using multiple models
    Malhotra, MK
    Sharma, S
    Nair, SS
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 114 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [23] CERES models in multiple objective decision-making process
    Kovacs, GJ
    Ritchie, JT
    Nemeth, T
    MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING FOR LAND, WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, : 281 - 289
  • [24] Ecological models supporting environmental decision making: a strategy for the future
    Schmolke, Amelie
    Thorbek, Pernille
    DeAngelis, Donald L.
    Grimm, Volker
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2010, 25 (08) : 479 - 486
  • [25] MODELS AND METHODS IN MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING - FOREWORD
    COLSON, G
    DEBRUYN, C
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 1989, 12 (10-11) : R7 - R8
  • [26] RECOGNIZING MULTIPLE DECISION-MAKING MODELS - A GUIDE FOR MANAGERS
    GIESECKE, J
    COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 1993, 54 (02): : 103 - 114
  • [27] SUBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CRITERIA.
    Larichev, O.I.
    1976, : 625 - 630
  • [28] MODELS OF DECISION-MAKING
    KAPLAN, MF
    SCHWARTZ, S
    CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 22 (04): : 342 - 342
  • [29] Adversary Decision-making using Markov Models
    Andreas, Elizabeth
    Dorismond, Jessica
    Gamarra, Marco
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING FOR MULTI-DOMAIN OPERATIONS APPLICATIONS V, 2023, 12538
  • [30] Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making
    Ascough, J. C., II
    Maier, H. R.
    Ravalico, J. K.
    Strudley, M. W.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 219 (3-4) : 383 - 399