The potential impacts of Emissions Trading Scheme and biofuel options to carbon emissions of US airlines

被引:20
|
作者
Chao, Hsun [1 ]
Agusdinata, Datu Buyung [2 ]
DeLaurentis, Daniel A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Aeronaut & Astronaut, 701 W Stadium Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
Aviation emissions; Emissions trading scheme policy; Sustainable aviation fuels; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; AVIATION; SYSTEM; ETHANOL; SAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110993
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To reduce carbon emissions, the European Union has implemented the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) since 2012 for intra-European commercial flights. In response, airlines have explored various means, including sustainable jet fuels. This article investigates how similar ETS policy would affect domestic carbon emissions when implemented in the United States. The study integrates a model of airlines operations optimization and multifeedstock biojet fuels life cycle assessment to simulate decisions of biojet fuel and commercial aviation industry responding to an emission policy. We conduct a Monte-Carlo simulation on two scenarios of domestic emission schemes to investigate the adoption of biojet fuels and its impacts on carbon emissions. Our model indicates that implementing an emission policy for U.S. airlines could incentivize adoption of biofuels-a median value of 10% of total fuels in 2050-while only marginally reduce travel demand. Because of a combined effect of emission policy and improved aircraft technology, the emissions in 2050 would only increase L37 times the 2005 level despite passenger demand grows by a factor of 2.75. A non-parametric sensitivity analysis suggests that the price of oil, economic growth, and carbon price are the three most significant factors in affecting the fleet-level carbon emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficiency versus Equality: Comparing Design Options for Indirect Emissions Accounting in the Korean Emissions Trading Scheme
    Oh, Inha
    Yeo, Yeongjun
    Lee, Jeong-Dong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (11): : 14982 - 15002
  • [22] Uk Emissions Trading Scheme
    不详
    HEAT TREATMENT OF METALS, 2001, 28 (04): : 98 - 98
  • [23] The EU emissions trading scheme
    Bailey, Ian
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2010, 1 (01) : 144 - 153
  • [24] The Guangdong Emissions Trading Scheme
    Luo Y.
    Wang W.
    Li X.
    Zhao D.
    Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 2019, 38 (04) : 42 - 62
  • [25] Temporal restrictions on emissions trading and the implications for the carbon futures market: Lessons from the EU emissions trading scheme
    Daskalakis, George
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 115 : 88 - 91
  • [26] An Integrated Approach to Simulate the Impacts of Carbon Emissions Trading Schemes
    Labandeira, Xavier
    Linares, Pedro
    Rodriguez, Miguel
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2009, 30 : 217 - 237
  • [27] Trading: UK launches emissions trading scheme
    Anon
    Petroleum Economist, 2002, 69 (02):
  • [28] Carbon Emissions Trading Potential of Turkiye's Forest
    Yildizbas, Nilay Tulukcu
    Hernandez, Hulya Kilic
    Yildirim, Hulya
    Gunes, Yusuf
    BIORESOURCES, 2023, 18 (04): : 8409 - 8431
  • [29] The effects of a linked carbon emissions trading scheme for Latin America
    Oliveira, Thais Diniz
    Gurgel, Angelo Costa
    Tonry, Steve
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2020, 20 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [30] Research on carbon price in emissions trading scheme: a bibliometric analysis
    Chang-Jing Ji
    Xiao-Yi Li
    Yu-Jie Hu
    Xiang-Yu Wang
    Bao-Jun Tang
    Natural Hazards, 2019, 99 : 1381 - 1396