A review of process fault detection and diagnosis Part III: Process history based methods

被引:1150
|
作者
Venkatasubramanian, V [1 ]
Rengaswamy, R
Kavuri, SN
Yin, K
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Chem Engn, Lab Intelligent Proc Syst, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Clarkson Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[3] BP, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Wood & Paper Sci, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
supervisory control; diagnosis; hybrid system;
D O I
10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00162-X
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this final part, we discuss fault diagnosis methods that are based on historic process knowledge. We also compare and evaluate the various methodologies reviewed in this series in terms of the set of desirable characteristics we proposed in Part I. This comparative study reveals the relative strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches. One realizes that no single method has all the desirable features one would like a diagnostic system to possess. It is our view that some of these methods can complement one another resulting in better diagnostic systems. Integrating these complementary features is one way to develop hybrid systems that could overcome the limitations of individual solution strategies. The important role of fault diagnosis in the broader context of process operations is also outlined. We also discuss the technical challenges in research and development that need to be addressed for the successful design and implementation of practical intelligent supervisory control systems for the process industries. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 346
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fault Detection and Diagnosis for Industry Process Based on Support Vector Data Description
    Zhang, Shuning
    Yang, Hongyong
    Deng, Guanlong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, AUTOMATION AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (EAME 2018), 2018, 127 : 364 - 371
  • [32] Fault Detection and Diagnosis of Continuous Process Based on Multiblock Principal Component Analysis
    Bie, Libo
    Wang, Xiangdong
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 200 - 204
  • [33] New fault detection and diagnosis strategy for nonlinear industrial process based on KECA
    Deng M.
    Liu J.
    Xu P.
    Tan S.
    Shang L.
    Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal, 2020, 71 (05): : 2151 - 2163
  • [34] Process Fault Diagnosis Based on Bayesian Inference
    Liu, Jialin
    Liu, Shu Jie
    Wong, David Shan Hill
    23 EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2013, 32 : 751 - 756
  • [35] Research on fault detection and identification methods of nonlinear dynamic process based on ICA
    Xie, Chao
    Zhang, Rui
    Bhola, Jyoti
    NONLINEAR ENGINEERING - MODELING AND APPLICATION, 2022, 11 (01): : 13 - 19
  • [36] Fault detection and diagnosis methods for photovoltaic systems: A review
    Mellit, A.
    Tina, G. M.
    Kalogirou, S. A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 91 : 1 - 17
  • [37] Fault detection and diagnosis method for batch process based on ELM-based fault feature phase identification
    Zhao, Zhen
    Zhang, Jun
    Sun, Yigang
    Tian, Huixin
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2016, 27 (01): : 167 - 173
  • [38] Fault detection and diagnosis method for batch process based on ELM-based fault feature phase identification
    Zhen Zhao
    Jun Zhang
    Yigang Sun
    Huixin Tian
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2016, 27 : 167 - 173
  • [39] Machine learning based mechanical fault diagnosis and detection methods: a systematic review
    Xin, Yuechuan
    Zhu, Jianuo
    Cai, Mingyang
    Zhao, Pengyan
    Zuo, Quanzhi
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 36 (01)
  • [40] Model-based fault diagnosis methods for systems with stochastic process-A survey
    Zhao, Zhen
    Liu, Peter Xiaoping
    Gao, Jinfeng
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2022, 513 : 137 - 152