Protein-Protein Docking with Dynamic Residue Protonation States

被引:16
|
作者
Kilambi, Krishna Praneeth [1 ]
Reddy, Kavan [1 ]
Gray, Jeffrey J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Program Mol Biophys, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CAPRI ROUNDS 20-27; PK(A) VALUES; STRUCTURAL DETERMINANTS; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; LIGAND-BINDING; PREDICTION; COMPLEX; PH; RESOLUTION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004018
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protein-protein interactions depend on a host of environmental factors. Local pH conditions influence the interactions through the protonation states of the ionizable residues that can change upon binding. In this work, we present a pH-sensitive docking approach, pHDock, that can sample side-chain protonation states of five ionizable residues (Asp, Glu, His, Tyr, Lys) on-the-fly during the docking simulation. pHDock produces successful local docking funnels in approximately half (79/161) the protein complexes, including 19 cases where standard RosettaDock fails. pHDock also performs better than the two control cases comprising docking at pH 7.0 or using fixed, predetermined protonation states. On average, the top-ranked pHDock structures have lower interface RMSDs and recover more native interface residue-residue contacts and hydrogen bonds compared to RosettaDock. Addition of backbone flexibility using a computationally-generated conformational ensemble further improves native contact and hydrogen bond recovery in the top-ranked structures. Although pHDock is designed to improve docking, it also successfully predicts a large pH-dependent binding affinity change in the Fc-FcRn complex, suggesting that it can be exploited to improve affinity predictions. The approaches in the study contribute to the goal of structural simulations of whole-cell protein-protein interactions including all the environmental factors, and they can be further expanded for pH-sensitive protein design.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clustering protein-protein docking predictions
    Tong, W
    Weng, Z
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2004, 26 : 2999 - 3002
  • [22] Protein-protein docking with rosettadock.
    Gray, JJ
    Baker, D
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 227 : U220 - U221
  • [23] Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking
    Kuroda, Daisuke
    Gray, Jeffrey J.
    STRUCTURE, 2016, 24 (10) : 1821 - 1829
  • [24] Progress in protein-protein docking approaches
    Li Chun-Hua
    Ma Xiao-Hui
    Chen Wei-Zu
    Wang Cun-Xin
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2006, 33 (07) : 616 - 621
  • [25] Protein-protein docking predictions with RosettaDock
    Gray, JJ
    Baker, D
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 86 (01) : 306A - 306A
  • [26] Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis by Docking
    Fink, Florian
    Ederer, Stephan
    Gronwald, Wolfram
    ALGORITHMS, 2009, 2 (01): : 429 - 436
  • [27] Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking
    Berchanski, A
    Shapira, B
    Eisenstein, M
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 56 (01) : 130 - 142
  • [28] Interolog interfaces in protein-protein docking
    Alsop, James D.
    Mitchell, Julie C.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 83 (11) : 1940 - 1946
  • [29] Computer Vision for Protein-protein Docking
    Rudden, Lucas S. P.
    Degiacomi, Matteo T.
    Willcocks, Chris G.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 118 (03) : 305A - 306A
  • [30] Protein-Protein Docking Dealing With the Unknown
    Moreira, Irina S.
    Fernandes, Pedro A.
    Ramos, Maria J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 31 (02) : 317 - 342