Protein-Protein Docking with Dynamic Residue Protonation States

被引:16
|
作者
Kilambi, Krishna Praneeth [1 ]
Reddy, Kavan [1 ]
Gray, Jeffrey J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Program Mol Biophys, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CAPRI ROUNDS 20-27; PK(A) VALUES; STRUCTURAL DETERMINANTS; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; LIGAND-BINDING; PREDICTION; COMPLEX; PH; RESOLUTION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004018
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protein-protein interactions depend on a host of environmental factors. Local pH conditions influence the interactions through the protonation states of the ionizable residues that can change upon binding. In this work, we present a pH-sensitive docking approach, pHDock, that can sample side-chain protonation states of five ionizable residues (Asp, Glu, His, Tyr, Lys) on-the-fly during the docking simulation. pHDock produces successful local docking funnels in approximately half (79/161) the protein complexes, including 19 cases where standard RosettaDock fails. pHDock also performs better than the two control cases comprising docking at pH 7.0 or using fixed, predetermined protonation states. On average, the top-ranked pHDock structures have lower interface RMSDs and recover more native interface residue-residue contacts and hydrogen bonds compared to RosettaDock. Addition of backbone flexibility using a computationally-generated conformational ensemble further improves native contact and hydrogen bond recovery in the top-ranked structures. Although pHDock is designed to improve docking, it also successfully predicts a large pH-dependent binding affinity change in the Fc-FcRn complex, suggesting that it can be exploited to improve affinity predictions. The approaches in the study contribute to the goal of structural simulations of whole-cell protein-protein interactions including all the environmental factors, and they can be further expanded for pH-sensitive protein design.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Protein-protein docking with interface residue restraints*
    Li, Hao
    Huang, Sheng-You
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2021, 30 (01)
  • [2] Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions
    Lorber, DM
    Udo, MK
    Shoichet, BK
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2002, 11 (06) : 1393 - 1408
  • [3] Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross-docking within the protein-protein docking server SwarmDock
    Torchala, Mieczyslaw
    Gerguri, Tereza
    Chaleil, Raphael A. G.
    Gordon, Patrick
    Russell, Francis
    Keshani, Miriam
    Bates, Paul A.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 88 (08) : 962 - 972
  • [4] pyDockEneRes: per-residue decomposition of protein-protein docking energy
    Romero-Durana, Miguel
    Jimenez-Garcia, Brian
    Fernandez-Recio, Juan
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 36 (07) : 2284 - 2285
  • [5] Protein-Protein Docking
    Ehrlich, Lutz P.
    Wade, Rebecca C.
    REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 17, 2001, 17 : 61 - 97
  • [6] Residue Environment Score for Selecting Protein Structure Models and Protein-Protein Docking Models
    Kim, HyungRae
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 110 (03) : 346A - 346A
  • [7] A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties
    Bernauer, J.
    Aze, J.
    Janin, J.
    Poupon, A.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 23 (05) : 555 - 562
  • [8] Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions
    Duan, YH
    Reddy, BVB
    Kaznessis, YN
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (02) : 316 - 328
  • [9] Dynamic Predispositions of Protein-Protein Docking Orientation Revealed by Intrinsic Dynamic Domains
    Yang, Lee Wei
    Sakuraba, Shun
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 98 (03) : 238A - 238A
  • [10] A protein-protein docking benchmark
    Chen, R
    Mintseris, J
    Janin, J
    Weng, ZP
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 52 (01): : 88 - 91