Does democratic transition reduce carbon intensity? Evidence from Indonesia using the synthetic control method

被引:18
|
作者
Mao, Yimin [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Coll Publ Adm, 18 Xuezheng Str, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Democracy; Carbon intensity; Synthetic control method; Indonesia; EMISSION INTENSITY; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; CAUSAL INFERENCE; URBANIZATION; ENERGY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-018-2165-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite growing concern about the low-carbon economic development, little is known about the role of political institutions, democracy, or the absence thereof, in controlling carbon intensity (carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP). This paper estimates the causal effects of democratic transition in Indonesia on its national carbon emission intensity. The synthetic control method is adopted to handle both time-invariant and time-variant confounding heterogeneity. Results show that Indonesia's democratic transition increases on average 0.24 kg carbon dioxide emissions per constant 2005 US dollar in the post-transition period (1999-2010), a rise of approximately 25.34%. The placebo tests indicate this causal effect is significant and the leave-oneout sensitivity check also demonstrates its robustness. The evidence of Indonesia suggests that democratic transition may serve to intensify, rather than mitigate, the emissions of carbon dioxide. Therefore, policymakers should pay more attentions to the contextual fit of democratic transition.
引用
收藏
页码:19908 / 19917
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does New Infrastructure Affect Regional Carbon Intensity? Empirical Evidence from China
    Liu, Bingquan
    Nie, Boyang
    Wang, Yakun
    Han, Xuemin
    Li, Yongqing
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [42] Does green innovation suppress carbon emission intensity? New evidence from China
    Jinli Liu
    Yuxin Duan
    Shen Zhong
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 86722 - 86743
  • [43] Does better access to credit help reduce energy intensity in China? Evidence from manufacturing firms
    Zhang, Dayong
    Li, Jun
    Ji, Qiang
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 145 (145)
  • [44] The reduce of energy consumption intensity: Does the development of science and technology finance matter? Evidence from China
    Ding, Rui
    Chen, Shihui
    Zhang, Bin
    Shen, Siwei
    Zhou, Tao
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 11206 - 11220
  • [45] Does technology diffusion help to reduce emission intensity? Evidence from organized manufacturing and agriculture in India
    Majumdar, Devleena
    Kar, Saibal
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 48 : 30 - 41
  • [46] Does ISO 50001 adoption reduce manufacturing energy intensity? Micro-evidence from China
    Wang, En-Ze
    Pan, Tong
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2025, 86 : 653 - 672
  • [47] Does Zakat reduce poverty? Evidence from Tunisia using the Fuzzy Approach
    Bouanani, Mejda
    Belhadj, Besma
    METROECONOMICA, 2020, 71 (04) : 835 - 850
  • [48] Does Green Finance Reduce Carbon Emissions? Global Evidence Based on System Generalized Method of Moments
    Basturk, Meryem Filiz
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (18)
  • [49] Does the financial support to rural areas help to reduce carbon emissions? Evidence from China
    Zhang, Shengling
    Dou, Wei
    Wu, Zihao
    Hao, Yu
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 127
  • [50] Does a Carbon Tax Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from British Columbia
    Felix Pretis
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2022, 83 : 115 - 144