共 50 条
Diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis with the Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria
被引:23
|作者:
Schneider, Alexander
[1
]
Michaely, Henrik
[3
]
Rueckert, Felix
[2
]
Weiss, Christel
[4
]
Stroebel, Philipp
[5
]
Belle, Sebastian
[1
]
Hirth, Michael
[1
]
Wilhelm, Torsten J.
[2
]
Haas, Stephan L.
[6
]
Jesenofsky, Ralf
[1
]
Schoenberg, Stefan
[3
]
Marx, Alexander
[5
]
Singer, Manfred V.
[1
]
Ebert, Matthias P.
[1
]
Pfuetzer, Roland H.
[1
]
Loehr, J. Matthias
[1
,6
]
机构:
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Med 2, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Surg, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Inst Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Med Stat, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Inst Pathol, Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词:
Autoimmune pancreatitis;
Chronic pancreatitis;
International consensus diagnostic criteria;
ICDC;
IgG4;
CONSENSUS;
TYPE-1;
GUIDELINES;
SURGERY;
LESIONS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.pan.2017.03.005
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background/Objectives: We had developed the Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria (U-AIP) to diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis (AiP) within the M-ANNHEIM classification of chronic pancreatitis. In 2011, International-Consensus-Diagnostic-Criteria (ICDC) to diagnose AiP have been published. We had applied the U-AIP long before the ICDC were available. The aims of the study were, first, to describe patients with AiP diagnosed by the U-AIP; second, to compare diagnostic accuracies of the U-AIP and other diagnostic systems; third, to evaluate the clinical applicability of the U-AIP. Methods: From 1998 until 2008, we identified patients with AiP using U-AIP, Japanese-,Korean-, Asian-, Mayo-HISORt-, Revised-Mayo-HISORt- and Italian-criteria. We retrospectively verified the diagnosis by ICDC and Revised-Japanese-2011-criteria, compared diagnostic accuracies of all systems and evaluated all criteria in consecutive patients with pancreatitis (2009 until 2010, Pancreas-Outpatient-Clinic-Cohort, n = 84). We retrospectively validated our diagnostic approach in consecutive patients with a pancreatic lesion requiring surgery (Surgical-Cohort, n = 98). Results: Overall, we identified 21 patients with AiP. Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria and ICDC presented the highest diagnostic accuracies (each 98.8%), highest Youden indices (each 0.95238), and highest proportions of diagnosed patients (each n = 20/21, U-AINICDC vs. other diagnostic systems, p < 0.05, McNemar test). In the Pancreas-Outpatient-Clinic-Cohort, seven patients were diagnosed with AiP (n = 6 by U-AIP, n = 1 by Asian-criteria). International-Consensus-Diagnostic-Criteria confirmed the diagnosis in these individuals. Based on partial fulfillment of U-AIP, AiP was initially suspected in 13% (n = 10/77) of remaining patients from the Pancreas-Outpatient-Clinic-Cohort. In the Surgical-cohort, we identified one patient with AiP by U-AIP and ICDC. Conclusions: Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria revealed a satisfactory clinical applicability and offered an additional approach to diagnose AiP. (C) 2017 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 394
页数:14
相关论文