Text-message Reminders in Colorectal Cancer Screening (TRICCS): a randomised controlled trial

被引:43
|
作者
Hirst, Yasemin [1 ]
Skrobanski, Hanna [1 ]
Kerrison, Robert S. [1 ]
Kobayashi, Lindsay C. [1 ,2 ]
Counsell, Nicholas [3 ]
Djedovic, Natasha [4 ]
Ruwende, Josephine [5 ]
Stewart, Mark [4 ]
von Wagner, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Res Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, Gower St, London WC1E 7BT, England
[2] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Populat & Dev Studies, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] UCL, Inst Canc, Canc Res UK & UCL Canc Trials Ctr, 90 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 4TJ, England
[4] St Marks Hosp, St Marks Bowel Canc Screening Ctr, Watford Rd, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[5] NHS England London Reg, 105 Victoria St, London SW1E 6QT, England
关键词
colorectal; cancer screening; randomised controlled trial; reminder; uptake; text-message; REPEAT PARTICIPATION; INTERVENTIONS; STRATEGIES; PROGRAM; BREAST;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2017.117
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We investigated the effectiveness of a text-message reminder to improve uptake of the English Bowel Cancer Screening programme in London. Methods: We performed a randomised controlled trial across 141 general practices in London. Eight thousand two hundred sixty-nine screening-eligible adults (aged 60-74 years) were randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive either a text-message reminder (n = 4134) or no text-message reminder (n = 4135) if they had not returned their faecal occult blood test kit within 8 weeks of initial invitation. The primary outcome was the proportion of adults returning a test kit at the end of an 18-week screening episode (intention-to-treat analysis). A subgroup analysis was conducted for individuals receiving an invitation for the first time. Results: Uptake was 39.9% in the control group and 40.5% in the intervention group. Uptake did not differ significantly between groups for the whole study population of older adults (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.12; P = 0.56) but did vary between the groups for first-time invitees (uptake was 34.9% in the control and 40.5% in the intervention; adjusted OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.58; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Although text-message reminders did not significantly increase uptake of the overall population, the improvement among first-time invitees is encouraging.
引用
收藏
页码:1408 / 1414
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of text-message reminders on paediatric malaria treatment adherence and their post-treatment return to health facilities in Kenya: a randomized controlled trial
    Ambrose O. Talisuna
    Amos Oburu
    Sophie Githinji
    Josephine Malinga
    Beatrice Amboko
    Philip Bejon
    Caroline Jones
    Robert W. Snow
    Dejan Zurovac
    Malaria Journal, 16
  • [32] Efficacy of text-message reminders on paediatric malaria treatment adherence and their post-treatment return to health facilities in Kenya: a randomized controlled trial
    Talisuna, Ambrose O.
    Oburu, Amos
    Githinji, Sophie
    Malinga, Josephine
    Amboko, Beatrice
    Bejon, Philip
    Jones, Caroline
    Snow, Robert W.
    Zurovac, Dejan
    MALARIA JOURNAL, 2017, 16
  • [33] This Nudge Was Not Enough: a Randomised Trial of Text Message Reminders of Court Dates to Victims and Witnesses
    Jonathan R. Cumberbatch
    Geoffrey C. Barnes
    Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing, 2018, 2 (1-2) : 35 - 51
  • [34] Text message reminders for timely routine MMR vaccination: A randomized controlled trial
    Hofstetter, Annika M.
    DuRivage, Nathalie
    Vargas, Celibell Y.
    Camargo, Stewin
    Vawdrey, David K.
    Fisher, Allison
    Stockwell, Melissa S.
    VACCINE, 2015, 33 (43) : 5741 - 5746
  • [35] Text Message Reminders for Second Dose of Influenza Vaccine: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Stockwell, Melissa S.
    Hofstetter, Annika M.
    DuRivage, Nathalie
    Barrett, Angela
    Fernandez, Nadira
    Vargas, Celibell Y.
    Camargo, Stewin
    PEDIATRICS, 2015, 135 (01) : E83 - E91
  • [36] TEXT-MESSAGE REMINDERS TO IMPROVE INFLUENZA IMMUNIZATION COMPLIANCE IN SICKLE CELL DISEASE PATIENTS
    George, Anil
    Luo, Jerry
    Duke, Taylor
    McGlynn, Mary
    Hsu, Lewis
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2019, 66
  • [37] COMPUTER REMINDERS FOR CHLAMYDIA SCREENING IN GENERAL PRACTICE: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Walker, J.
    Walker, S.
    Fairley, C. K.
    Gunn, J.
    Pirotta, M.
    Gurrin, L.
    Carter, R.
    Hocking, J.
    SEXUAL HEALTH, 2009, 6 (04) : 363 - 363
  • [38] TEXT MESSAGE PREFERENCES FOR SURVEILLANCE COLONOSCOPY REMINDERS AMONG COLORECTAL CANCER SURVIVORS
    Hohl, Sarah
    Shankaran, Veena
    Bell-Brown, Ari
    Issaka, Rachel
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2020, 54 : S705 - S705
  • [39] Text Message Preferences for Surveillance Colonoscopy Reminders Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors
    Hohl, Sarah D.
    Shankaran, Veena
    Bell-Brown, Ari
    Issaka, Rachel B.
    HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2020, 47 (04) : 581 - 591
  • [40] Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial
    Kaalby, Lasse
    Deding, Ulrik
    Kobaek-Larsen, Morten
    Havshoi, Anne-Line Volden
    Zimmermann-Nielsen, Erik
    Thygesen, Marianne Kirstine
    Kroeijer, Rasmus
    Bjorsum-Meyer, Thomas
    Baatrup, Gunnar
    BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 7 (01):