20 years of experience with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: what have we learned?

被引:31
|
作者
Caporali, Roberto [1 ]
Crepaldi, Gloria [2 ]
Codullo, Veronica [1 ]
Benaglio, Francesca [1 ]
Monti, Sara [1 ]
Todoerti, Monica [1 ]
Montecucco, Carlomaurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, IRCCS Policlin San Matteo Fdn, Div Rheumatol, Pavia, Italy
[2] Mauriziano Hosp, Rheumatol Unit, Turin, Italy
关键词
effectiveness; long-term experience; rheumatoid arthritis; safety; TNF inhibitors; ANTI-TNF THERAPY; MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS; ADALIMUMAB PLUS METHOTREXATE; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS PATIENTS; ALPHA MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; CONCOMITANT METHOTREXATE; COMBINATION THERAPY; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; EFFICACY; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/key059
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
TNF inhibitors are biologic DMARDs approved for the treatment of active RA in mid-1990s. They still represent a valuable therapeutic option to control the activity, disability and radiographic progression of the disease. In the context of TNF inhibitors, there are currently several molecules and different administration routes that provide optimal treatment personalization, allowing us to respond to a patient's needs in the best possible way. The increasing use of TNF inhibitors has not only improved the management of RA, but it has also helped in our understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease. This review focuses on the basis of this targeted therapy and on the knowledge gained from their use about therapeutic effects and adverse events. Effectiveness analysed from drug registries and safety issues are presented together with recent data on infections (in particular, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and hepatitis B), cancer (lymphoma, skin cancers) and cardiovascular risk.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 10
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomechanics and neural control of movement, 20 years later: what have we learned and what has changed?
    Andrew D. Nordin
    William Z. Rymer
    Andrew A. Biewener
    Andrew B. Schwartz
    Daofen Chen
    Fay B. Horak
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 14
  • [42] Biomechanics and neural control of movement, 20 years later: what have we learned and what has changed?
    Nordin, Andrew D.
    Rymer, William Z.
    Biewener, Andrew A.
    Schwartz, Andrew B.
    Chen, Daofen
    Horak, Fay B.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 14
  • [43] Two years of COVID-19 and tourism: what we learned, and what we should have learned
    Goessling, Stefan
    Schweiggart, Nadja
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM, 2022, 30 (04) : 915 - 931
  • [44] Chemoprevention in colorectal cancer - where we stand and what we have learned from twenty years' experience
    Boghossian, Shahe
    Hawash, Ahmed
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2012, 10 (01): : 43 - 52
  • [45] Biotinidase deficiency: What have we learned in forty years?
    Tankeu, Aurel T.
    Van Winckel, Geraldine
    Elmers, Jolanda
    Jaccard, Evrim
    Superti-Furga, Andrea
    Wolf, Barry
    Tran, Christel
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2023, 138 (04)
  • [46] 15 YEARS OF REDUCTIVE COUPLING - WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED
    CARNAHAN, EM
    PROTASIEWICZ, JD
    LIPPARD, SJ
    ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 26 (03) : 90 - 97
  • [47] THE ANGELCHIK PROSTHESIS - WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 15 YEARS
    CROOKES, PF
    DEMEESTER, TR
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1994, 57 (06): : 1385 - 1386
  • [48] ECT after 70 years: What have we learned?
    Fink, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 7 : S88 - S88
  • [49] THE TME TRIAL: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 10 YEARS?
    Marijnen, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S67 - S67
  • [50] What have we learned about glycogenosis in recent years?
    Laforet, P.
    REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2016, 172 (10) : 541 - 545