A dynamic simulation approach to support operational decision-making in underground mining

被引:5
|
作者
Huerta, Jairo Romero [1 ]
Silva, Ranyere Sousa [2 ]
De Tomi, Giorgio [2 ]
Marques Ayres da Silva, Anna Luiza [2 ]
机构
[1] Compania Minera Kolpa, Calle Independencia 452, Lima, Peru
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, 2373 Cidade Univ, BR-05508030 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Underground mining; Material production; Equipment utilization; Industry profitability; Operational decision-making; Dynamic simulation; MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.simpat.2021.102458
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Underground mining is a highly competitive industry that is often singularly focused on material production as a key performance indicator. However, maximizing material production does not always maximize industry profitability. Equipment utilization in support of underground mining operations is a significant factor that affects both material production rates and industry profitability. Specifically, uncertainties related to equipment fleet acquisition, operations, and maintenance can challenge the predictability of profit margins based on material production. With a focus on maximizing industry profitability, a methodology to support operational decision making in underground mining based on dynamic simulation was developed. First, data related to underground mining operations from a medium-sized mine in southern Peru were collected and processed. Based on them, relevant operational indicators were selected and defined for inclusion in the simulation model. Next, the simulation model was formulated and applied to four scenarios with distinctive equipment fleets and associated material production rates. Simulation results indicated that the scenario with the lowest equipment fleet costs and the lowest associated material production rate (base case) had a profitability margin that was nearly 13 times higher than the scenario with the highest equipment fleet costs and the highest associated material production rate. This dynamic simulation methodology, which was successfully demonstrated in this study, can be broadly applied to support operational decision-making in underground mining to maximize industry profitability based on a wider and holistic array of factors beyond material production.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] DECISION-MAKING AND MONITORING IN MINING
    KORTELEV, OB
    KUZNETSOV, AS
    SYCHEV, VA
    IVANOV, YV
    JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE, 1992, 28 (03) : 286 - 294
  • [23] On How to Approach Risk and Uncertainty to Support Decision-making
    Terje Aven
    Risk Management, 2004, 6 (4) : 27 - 39
  • [24] The SMH approach as support for decision-making in a technical context
    Kranabitl, Philipp
    Faustmann, Clemens
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [25] Agent-based distributed decision-making in dynamic operational environments
    Gorodetsky, Vladimir
    Karsaev, Oleg
    Samoylov, Vladimir
    Serebryakov, Sergey
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2009, 3 (01): : 35 - 57
  • [26] Dynamic decision making without expected utility: An operational approach
    Nielsen, TD
    Jaffray, JY
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 169 (01) : 226 - 246
  • [27] Decision-making in IT service management: a simulation based approach
    Orta, Elena
    Ruiz, Mercedes
    Hurtado, Nuria
    Gawn, David
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2014, 66 : 36 - 51
  • [28] The simBorg approach to modelling a dynamic decision-making task
    Myers, CW
    Neth, H
    Schoelles, MJ
    Gray, WD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE MODELING, 2004, : 372 - 373
  • [29] Simulation and mathematical programming decision-making support for smallholder farming
    Collins A.J.
    Vegesana K.B.
    Seiler M.J.
    O'Shea P.
    Hettiarachchi P.
    McKenzie F.
    Environment Systems and Decisions, 2013, 33 (3) : 427 - 439
  • [30] The Benefits of Using Computer Simulation Models to Support Decision-Making
    Malec, Elzbieta
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING (MANUFACTURING 2017), 2018, : 205 - 214